Maybe I'm crazy, but, I believe the Chain of Command will not allow Trump to order military violence on U.S. soil.

The US President is not subject to laws, when acting in his official capacity, unless at least 1/2 of the House and 2/3 of the Senate vote to impeach him. So winning the election is a license to do illegal things, if you have enough political support.

The USA is fucked. Your systems have horribly failed to stop him and the rest of the world has no interest in getting into a fight with the strongest country in the world over how many Holocausts it plans to do in its territory (or, realistically, Canadian territory).

Could stop him or would stop him? SCOTUS has granted him blanket immunity for anything done as an "official act", without bothering to specify exactly what an official act is. This has opened up a Pandora's Box, needless to say. They're literally expanding the power of the President, not limiting it.

Congress, since it is fully GOP-dominated, will neither impeach him nor attempt to override any veto should they pass laws to curtail his activities. Not that they would, of course.

The military has a duty to follow the Constitution and is supposed to disregard any orders to the contrary. But whether the military will act according to Trump or the Constitution is an open question. Remember, Trump has removed a number of senior officers whose loyalty to him was in question. And there are a lot of right-wing extremist types in the lower ranks of the military.

In short, we're probably FUCKED.

He is commander in chief of the US military.

The US military stresses disobeying illegal orders.

So the simple answer is the US military chain of command respecting their oath to the constitution over loyalty to Trump.

Keep in mind that he already ordered the military forces to siege US cities, and they gone through the process of doing it while refusing to escalate into actual violence.

Trump doesn't seem to have that much control. I'm not sure he would be arrested if he ordered a strike, but I don't think it would happen either.

Look at it this way, Trump is legally capable of firing the Chairman of the Federal Reserve Bank (Jerome Powell), and he hates that man's fucking guts. Practically speaking though, Trump can't sack the guy without sending shockwaves through the financial world and tanking our economy. At the moment, Trump is trying to trump up (heh) a reason to fire Powell because he can't do it by fiat.

If his hands are tied over this thing he can legally do, you think he'd be able to bomb American cities? Think even the stoutest MAGA would applaud the bombing of New Orleans? They're turning on him over the pedo thing, destroying an American city is two orders of magnitude worse.

On paper there's plenty that could. The Supreme Court could have stepped in to stop a lot of this. Executive orders only stand in places where a full fledged law from congress doesn't cover the issue. The military is theoretically as obligated to disobey an unlawful order as they are to obey a lawful one and states are theoretically pretty insulated from federal interference except in a few explicit areas.

But, we don't live on paper and none of those protections exist unless there are people out there who are ready, willing, and able, to act on them. What happens if the Supreme Court somehow manages to rule against the administration and they just flagrantly disregard the order? What happens if Trump orders the military to start attacking US citizens openly or starts an illegal war without congressional approval? What happens if Trump runs for president again in 2028? Or just says he's president for life and we're not doing elections anymore?

The answer is nothing, unless people stand up against him. And... so far... we haven't seen much of that. Not from people in government at any rate. We've seen a bit from normal folks on the ground in places like LA, but our government's been working to neuter the power of popular protest since the civil rights protests, perhaps even earlier. So reasonable people can disagree on the efficacy of that.

I really don't want to echo the doomer line I've seen written here a lot, but yeah, we're probably fucked. Like maybe if something was done like... a decade ago? Two? Maybe we wouldn't be in this situation. But... as things stand? I don't even know if the damage from the first Trump presidency can ever truly be repaired and more damage is being done on a weekly, almost a daily basis. Personally? I think it's only a matter of time before this man breaks the global economy irreparably. In a way that simply can't be swept under the rug again. Domestically? Who the fuck knows at this point? I have to resist the urge to laugh out loud whenever people ask where I see myself in five years because at this point I've got no idea what the next two weeks are gonna hold.

So... yeah. Fun times in the ol US of A.

How familiar are you with the concept of civil war?

If he would go to bomb an American city a civil war will start. Then they authority to stop him or not will rely on the winner of the war.

I'm no expert but also long as the USA doesn't bomb another country isn’t it's kind of the responsibility of the USA itself and their people?

We'll ultimately be rescued by an invading foreign army: Canada, Mexico or China.

USA fucked

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=YYJ5ZViYhHQ

No, the USA is not fucked.

Everything happening now has happened before, and worse, and the USA has endured. It may take some time, but the US will be fine.