all 2 comments

sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] 6 points 1 day ago

Hakeem isn't a traitor funnily enough. He like every Amerikan politician only serve the bourgeois class and always have. The people feeling betrayed were the ones falling once again for electoralism when it has been proven time and time again that you do not vote your way out of fascism.

🎯 1
  • source
  • [–] 2 points 1 day ago

    Not to defend Jeffries, but a third Trump impeachment would be as much of a waste of time as the first two. It would be great for TV advertisers, though, because Blue Maga would be glued to the tube again.

  • source
  • 8 comments in c/usa@midwest.social view that post
    [–] 11 points 1 day ago

    He's not wrong.

    I'm really enjoying this trend of speaking engagement disruption of these chucklefucks

  • source
  • [–] 5 points 1 day ago (6 children)

    Will someone please explain why you think impeachment will do any good?

    Even if you manage to get the votes, what actually changes? JD becomes President and throws the Left a few bones. 2028 and brand new 'Never Trumper' Musk pays for a bunch of fresh faced GOPs. Sarah Palin becomes President.

    I'd do what El-Sayed suggested. Call 'Medicare For All' the 'Donald Trump is a Beloved Genius Bill.' Impeach Pete H and blame him for the Iran War.

    Let Trump[ have his last two years and then go after him in state courts when he doen't have the DOJ.

  • source
  • hideshow 6 child comments
  • [–] 5 points 1 day ago (2 children)

    Will someone please explain why you think impeachment will do any good?

    Yeah! Why use the method available to you to hold someone accountable to hold someone accountable? Instead just let them continue on without accountability.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • 4 comments in c/progressivepolitics@lemmy.world view that post
    [–] 5 points 1 day ago (2 children)

    For sure! We absolutely demand performative gestures with no realistic chance of removal rather than substantive oversight and things like removal of war funding!

  • source
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] 1 point 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago)

    Au contraire, Shell.

    I fully believe the Dems are going to spend the next two years prioritizing sham hearings that produce nothing of substance other than content for political junkies. And when Abdul and friends object to it and demand that the party focus on its affordability mandate, they're going to be swift-boated for it.

    Corruption hearings give them the perfect cover for doing absolutely nothing apart from making sure their rich golf buddies, and themselves, continue to transfer unimaginable wealth to themselves from exploited poor and working class.

  • source
  • parent
  • [–] 2 points 1 day ago