all 5 comments

sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] 8 points 3 days ago

no, let him stay on an ruin the company.

fuck investors i want cheap gpus

  • source
  • [–] 2 points 3 days ago

    What for? Boss' name doesn't matter. Too much drama out of nothing.

  • source
  • [–] 1 point 3 days ago*

    I'm convinced this whole thing was an open secret. I would not be quick to believe investor outcry was anything except them saving face to mitigate the probe into their business dealings. That's how little trust I have in any corp.

  • source
  • [–] 1 point 2 days ago

    He doesn't have to, the board will remove him. It's their best move.

  • source
  • [–] 1 point 2 days ago

    Anyone find an un-paywalled link? Curious about what possible “reasoning” the economist can offer

  • source