Guess not only the Brazilian election had one sided "bugs" happen on Meta products.

no comments (yet)

sorted by: hot top controversial new old
there doesn't seem to be anything here
7 comments in c/politics@lemmy.world view that post
[–] 13 points 1 week ago (5 children)

“Meta acknowledged that it made a mistake, but an apology without action does nothing to ensure that this kind of censorship won’t happen again,”

That would require actual moderation by humans. And that costs money.

  • source
  • hideshow 5 child comments
  • [–] 2 points 1 week ago (4 children)

    you think Facebook doesn't want this to happen again?

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 4 child comments
  • [–] 2 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago) (3 children)

    I don't think they do, no. But I also think they probably don't care, because there won't be consequences.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 3 child comments
  • [–] 2 points 1 week ago (2 children)

    there are. they get more of their favorite; fascism.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] 12 points 1 week ago

    Remember how the conservatives were rending their garments over Hunter's hard drive laptop October surprise fizzling?

    And how they had Matt Taibbi publish the "Twitter files" after fElon took over Twitter? A great big fucking nothingburger, but I'm sure they'll be just as outraged about squelching activism? Right?

  • source
  • 4 comments in c/politics@lemmy.dbzer0.com view that post
    [–] 6 points 4 days ago (1 child)
  • [–] 2 points 4 days ago

    According to Stone, the Claude tool was “reading profiles, posts, and hashtags,” which  “sharply” increased the account’s activity in “intense bursts” that “resembled automated bot traffic rather than an ordinary human browsing our systems.”

    Bots for me, but not for thee.

  • source
  • [–] -3 points 4 days ago

    The No Kings corporate sponsors are going to be upset

  • source