Guess not only the Brazilian election had one sided "bugs" happen on Meta products.

no comments (yet)

sorted by: hot top controversial new old
there doesn't seem to be anything here
10 comments in c/technology@lemmy.world view that post
[–] 43 points 3 days ago

What kind of people are these who have $100 billion and are sucking an ugly old dick with only $2-3 billion?

  • source
  • zuckerberg and its whole clan need to be exterminated.

  • source
  • [–] 28 points 3 days ago (3 children)

    When this MF dies and things hopefully get better don’t forget who supported him

  • source
  • hideshow 3 child comments
  • [–] 4 points 2 days ago

    “Building is my love language” is a wild thing to put on a shirt when you’re motto is “Move fast and break things.”

  • source
  • [–] 3 points 2 days ago (1 child)

    Is arstechnica frequently giving really annoying captchas for anyone else?

  • source
  • hideshow 1 child comment
  • [–] 3 points 2 days ago

    This has no relation to technology whatsoever. Neither Meta or zuck are relevant to anything besides spreading misinformation and interfering with elections around the world. As for the other clown, he's famously quoted by "it's all computers!", and single handedly decided to change name of AI for some recently developed unknown namechanging kink.

  • source
  • 9 comments in c/politics@sh.itjust.works view that post
    [–] 43 points 5 days ago
    [–] 33 points 5 days ago (4 children)

    Isn't this the second time they did this?

  • source
  • hideshow 4 child comments
  • [–] 16 points 5 days ago (3 children)
  • Using any meta product directly supports fascism.

  • source
  • [–] 0 points 4 days ago (1 child)

    Not even the mealy-mouthed accomodationist anti-movements are safe

  • source
  • hideshow 1 child comment
  • 7 comments in c/politics@lemmy.world view that post
    [–] 13 points 3 days ago (5 children)

    “Meta acknowledged that it made a mistake, but an apology without action does nothing to ensure that this kind of censorship won’t happen again,”

    That would require actual moderation by humans. And that costs money.

  • source
  • hideshow 5 child comments
  • [–] 2 points 3 days ago (4 children)

    you think Facebook doesn't want this to happen again?

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 4 child comments
  • [–] 2 points 3 days ago* (last edited 3 days ago) (3 children)

    I don't think they do, no. But I also think they probably don't care, because there won't be consequences.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 3 child comments
  • [–] 2 points 2 days ago (2 children)

    there are. they get more of their favorite; fascism.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] 12 points 3 days ago

    Remember how the conservatives were rending their garments over Hunter's hard drive laptop October surprise fizzling?

    And how they had Matt Taibbi publish the "Twitter files" after fElon took over Twitter? A great big fucking nothingburger, but I'm sure they'll be just as outraged about squelching activism? Right?

  • source
  • 3 comments in c/politics@lemmy.dbzer0.com view that post
    [–] 4 points 2 hours ago (1 child)
  • [–] -2 points 2 hours ago

    The No Kings corporate sponsors are going to be upset

  • source