all 10 comments

sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] 23 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago)

I'm in awe of this one. It's literally the first thing they teach you in intelligence data science - don't go out and confirm if a leak is real by googling names from the fucking document. It's the joke example they give at the start of the fucking training, like "this is so obvious that people might overlook how obvious it is and do it lol, so think carefully about what you're doing if there's a leak!"

I mean I know how stupid these fuckers are, but god damn is it infuriating to be constantly beat over the head with how stupid they are and yet they seem to be endlessly successful at pushing through their idiocy. I just. Fuck. I'm just so tired.

  • source
  • [–] 40 points 1 week ago (7 children)

    Speaking as community defense knowledgable, yea the MAGA are dumber than shit. It's a win for the good guys.

  • source
  • hideshow 7 child comments
  • [–] 23 points 1 week ago (6 children)

    You can't be smart and still support trump in 2026.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 6 child comments
  • [–] [S] 9 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago)

    The worst part of reading project 2025 is that it made me realize the fascists in the heritage foundation can actually be smart and understand how o achieve their goals.

  • source
  • parent
  • [–] 4 points 1 week ago (2 children)

    The radicalized ones can, but they're already beyond redemption.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] -1 points 1 week ago (1 child)

    If you got yourself radicalized (i.e. allowed being controlled by emotions) are you really smart?

    I think the confusion is that it's very easy to destroy something, but it is very hard to build.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 1 child comment
  • [–] 1 point 1 week ago

    Searching for all my enemies to frame them

  • source
  • 7 comments in c/politicalmemes@lemmy.world view that post
    [–] 72 points 1 week ago
    [–] 42 points 1 week ago

    Fucking

    LOL

  • source
  • [–] 24 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago) (3 children)

    i believe that companies like incogni - "Data Broker Removal Service" advertised by every other youtuber, is a scam operating on same principle, only there you give them your data AND pay for it, while these ice morons provided their data for free 😂

  • source
  • hideshow 3 child comments
  • [–] 10 points 1 week ago (2 children)

    tl;dr data broker removal services work, on a very limited set of data brokers (not the big ones, not the most impactful ones, not the ones that intentionally don't keep your name but keep everything else about you), for about 6 months at a time. they're truly useless. if you live in california that state has its own opt-out service that's much more effective and also free: https://privacy.ca.gov/drop/

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] 9 points 1 week ago (1 child)

    oh i am not even american, but i don't see how this can conceptually work.

    • "excuse me, are you storing any information on john doe? i would like you to delete them"
    • "you have to be more precise sir, we can have lot of john does"
    • "john doe living at evergreen terrace 123, social security number 456789. do you have anything on me?"
    • "well, we did not until right now, thank you, sir!"
  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 1 child comment
  • [–] 4 points 1 week ago

    The good services (that sensibility do not advertise) poison the datasets with "John J. Doe"s who happen to live in 37 different places and have 712 separate credit card histories, each entry more complete than John doe's

  • source
  • parent
  • [–] 23 points 1 week ago

    🤣 this makes my day

  • source