all 3 comments

sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] 16 points 1 week ago (2 children)

They did this in my area as well. Took like 15 years for us to get bike lanes put in an area. A bunch of residents in the area were complaining that they were running over the armadillo lane separators with their cars. A few months later the city came back out and ripped them out.

  • source
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • 3 comments in c/fuckcars@lemmy.world view that post
    [–] 7 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago)

    Alberta is stepping backwards I see.

    Next sidewalks will be removed as we rarely see them being used.

    Meanwhile, safe dedicated infrastructure that's not reliant on the ownership of a car is the way forward, especially for a population that is aging, and specifically what makes a city financial solvent in the long run.

    Hell the common statement about cars being required for disability reasons is misleading.

    What that argument actually implies is people with disabilities do not have independent freedom to mobility. This is because they may now become dependent on someone else (with a car) to move around a city.

    For example someone in a wheel chair, or someone that is blind, or hell someone that is old and no longer has a license needs to always ask a family member or friend with a car to drive them to a destination.

    Give me options to get around conveniently and effectively without depending on a car, or having to cross six lanes of traffic or gigantic parking lots!

    When I get old I don't want to be stuck in a car dependent American style suburb, where I will need to ask my kids to take the day off work to drive me to the mall or the doctor's office as a example.

  • source
  • [–] 2 points 1 week ago

    That’s about a week of monster truck gas in 2027, doable.

  • source
  • [–] 1 point 1 week ago

    Is it just me or is construction like 5x as expensive pre-pandemic, or am I just unaware?

  • source