top 7 comments

sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] 22 points 1 year ago

Amazon bought Ring in 2018 and the enshitification has been coming for years, just another reason to ditch all Ring cameras.

  • source
  • [–] 4 points 1 year ago (1 child)

    In that case, I'd create a second wireless network that doesn't have internet access to keep it all in-house under my control.

  • source
  • hideshow 1 child comment
  • load more comments (1 reply)
    [–] 2 points 1 year ago

    If you use ‘em end-to-end encrypt the storage and transmission. You lose some features but at least it makes hijacking them more inconvenient.

  • source
  • [–] 1 point 1 year ago (3 children)

    Yeah, my house has Wyze cams, and it very much wasn't up to me, and I was still pissed about it before I saw this article. Yes, I'm pissed'er now.

  • source
  • hideshow 3 child comments
  • [–] 4 points 1 year ago (2 children)
  • [–] 2 points 1 year ago (1 child)

    Sounds like you have more faith they're not likely to follow suit than I do.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 1 child comment
  • [–] 4 points 1 year ago*

    Depending on your specific Wyze cameras, you can literally make them local only and never need to send back to Wyze servers. https://robsears.com/wyze-cam-v2-rtsp-iptables/

    Edit: actually, looks like it’s officially supported for v3 as well. https://support.wyze.com/hc/en-us/articles/360051619871-Does-Wyze-Cam-v3-support-RTSP

    So yeah, completely different ball game. If Wyze ever does anything you don’t like you can just turn your cameras into cameras you control completely.

  • source
  • parent
  • 92 comments in c/technology@lemmy.world view that post
    7 comments in c/technology@beehaw.org view that post
    4 comments in c/privacy@lemmy.dbzer0.com view that post