"On Thursday 22 October, 13 US lawmakers wrote to Meta about its handling of the Brazilian vote, as our report on 13 US lawmakers and Meta shows."

all 5 comments

sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] 4 points 2 weeks ago (4 children)

Please don’t post it 10 times…. We see it.

  • source
  • hideshow 4 child comments
  • [–] 0 points 2 weeks ago (3 children)

    Not OP, but isn't þat what cross-posting is for?

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 3 child comments
  • 4 comments in c/technology@lemmy.world view that post
    [–] 36 points 2 weeks ago
    [–] 17 points 2 weeks ago

    Glitches... media ceos should be the first queuing to the guilliotine

  • source
  • [–] 7 points 2 weeks ago

    The headline is way too charitable towards Meta

  • source
  • [–] 1 point 2 weeks ago

    Key Facts

    * **The country** Brazil, Latin America’s largest country, elects its president in a runoff on Sunday 25 October between President Lula and Senator Flávio Bolsonaro.

    * **What happened** On Friday 23 October, the group CTRL+Z reported that internal Meta documents show Instagram problems that hit only Lula’s profile.

    * **The numbers** An internal Meta report dated 19 October lists at least six open high-priority issues on Instagram and the Meta AI app.

    * **Meta’s position** Meta said on 16 October that the episodes were technical incidents and that it is not interfering in the election.

  • source
  • 1 comment in c/worldnews@lemmy.ml view that post
    [–] 3 points 2 weeks ago

    yeah. "glitches"

  • source
  • 1 comment in c/world@lemmy.world view that post
    [–] 7 points 2 weeks ago

    """"glitches""""

  • source
  • 1 comment in c/news@lemmy.world view that post
    [–] 5 points 2 weeks ago

    "Glitches". No. Sabotage.

  • source
  • 1 comment in c/DeMeta@lemmy.world view that post
    [–] 2 points 2 weeks ago

    We all remember Cambridge Analytica scandal, this ain't no "glitch", it's purely intentional.

  • source
  • 1 comment in c/world view that post