As she faces a tough reelection fight in Maine, Republican Sen. Susan Collins is twisting the facts about her role in laying the groundwork for the US Supreme Court's overturning of abortion rights.

Throughout the campaign, Collins has been dogged by questions about her fateful decision in 2018 to cast a key vote to confirm Justice Brett Kavanaugh to the court. In 2022, he joined the court's conservative majority to overturnthe 1973 Roe v. Wade precedent, allowing states to impose severe new bans and restrictions on abortion.

In June, Collins—who has described herself as pro-choice—said she did "not regret" her vote to confirm Kavanaugh, falsely claiming that Roe was overturned by a 6-3 margin and was therefore doomed regardless of her vote. In fact, the precedent was overturned by a 5-4 margin, meaning Kavanaugh's vote proved decisive.

Now in a dead heat race with Democratic nominee Troy Jackson, who has repeatedly hammered her on abortion rights, Collins has continued to defend her confirmation vote. She's also kept fudging the truth.

“I’m very disappointed in his vote to overturn Roe v. Wade,” Collins said of Kavanaugh during an interview published Monday by Maine ABC affiliate WMTW. “There was no way for me to anticipate that.”

Collins had, in fact, been warned that Kavanaugh might overturn Roe v. Wade. In her October 5, 2018, speech supporting his confirmation, she explicitly acknowledged “the concern that Judge Kavanaugh would seek to overturn Roe v. Wade” and noted that President Donald Trump had pledged to nominate judges who would do so.

Reproductive freedom advocates cautioned her that Kavanaugh was not being truthful when he said he considered Roe to be settled precedent, citing his history of ruling against abortion access and praising former Chief Justice William Rehnquist’s dissent in Roe.

But Collins dismissed these advocates' warnings, arguing that Republican-appointed Justices Sandra Day O’Connor, David Souter, and Anthony Kennedy had voted to reaffirm Roe despite opposition to some of their nominations from abortion rights groups. “Suffice it to say, prominent advocacy organizations have been wrong,” Collins said.

In this case, they were not. Lisa Margulies, spokesperson for Planned Parenthood Votes in Maine, said it was dishonest of Collins to plead innocence.

"It’s just a flat-out lie that Susan Collins had ‘no way’ of knowing Brett Kavanaugh would overturn our federal right to abortion," she said. "Mainers drove down to DC and begged her not to confirm him. They knew he was a direct threat to abortion, and so did Susan Collins."

"This is just another flimsy attempt to avoid responsibility for her actions," Margulies said. "Enough is enough. Mainers deserve better than a senator who will throw their rights under the bus and then refuse to acknowledge the harm done."


From Common Dreams via This RSS Feed.

no comments (yet)

sorted by: hot top controversial new old
there doesn't seem to be anything here
7 comments in c/gestapo_usa@lemmy.dbzer0.com view that post
[–] 20 points 3 weeks ago

Yeah she lies a lot

  • source
  • [–] 8 points 3 weeks ago

    She really takes people for idiots. And to be fair, they keep voting for her.

    I'm not even American and it was obvious this entitled asshole would do more than just boof beer.

  • source
  • [–] 6 points 3 weeks ago (1 child)

    If she were assassinated in the street by one of her victims, I wonder if her last words would be, "There was no way for me to anticipate that."

  • source
  • hideshow 1 child comment
  • [–] 5 points 3 weeks ago* (last edited 3 weeks ago)

    Look obviously she is complicit/lying, and we all can see that. But what also bothers me is how our society approaches dealing with people like her.

    As a person in a position of power/leadership she is expected to have good judgement. That’s the same sort of thing we expect of a pilot in an aircraft. If the weather forecast says the weather will get bad in a few hours, other pilots warn the pilot about the weather getting bad, and the controller radios the pilot before takeoff saying “hey the weather is getting bad, are you sure?” and then the pilot takes off and has a crash due to weather - we all say this person has bad judgment and should not be a pilot.

    So even IF she were telling the truth (which she is not), she was warned repeatedly about this specific outcome and ignored it. Everyone who cares remotely about this issue should be saying “Best case she has poor judgment and shouldn’t be in charge of anything.”

  • source
  • [–] 7 points 3 weeks ago

    Fuck this cunt. Couldn’t have known my ass. I hope she’s tried and hung like we should do with the rest of them.

  • source
  • [–] -1 points 3 weeks ago

    Platner would've won. The fact it's in the air means we have the wrong candidate.

    SA allegations are the go to method of disqualifying candidates the establishment doesn't like.

    Why are there 0 white populists in the democratic party at the federal level? Excepting Bernie, and he's jewish, and older than old. Because white populists could take the party from them, and that is what they fear most. Beating republicans is secondary.

  • source