all 3 comments

sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] 2 points 3 weeks ago (1 child)

"Reaching net zero sooner means facing fewer of them". It also means traumatic deindustrialization and a sharp falloff in population. Yeah, I suppose if the post-fossil fuel world has only 5% of the current world population, then there are fewer people to be impacted by such events.

  • source
  • hideshow 1 child comment
  • [–] 1 point 3 weeks ago

    Lol, so basically we can ignore one chance.

  • source
  • 3 comments in c/climate@slrpnk.net view that post
    [–] 7 points 4 weeks ago*

    Scientists have always understood El Niño to be a phenomenon that temporarily alters global weather, with conditions returning to “normal” when it dissipates. However, climate change is expected to change what “normal” looks like.

    As the planet warms, extreme El Niño years are likely to become more common. Our research suggests the tropical Pacific could remain in an El Niño-like state for centuries – even if the world reaches net zero carbon emissions – and extreme El Niño years would occur more often.

  • source
  • [–] 2 points 4 weeks ago (1 child)

    Ope - I guess we’re fucked 🙃

  • source
  • hideshow 1 child comment