Yeap, this seems to fit.

Way too many good crosspost material lately.

all 11 comments

sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] 18 points 1 year ago* (7 children)

for reviewing gaming handhelds.

No. That's not why. Click-bait headline.

Some of these devices ship with pre-loaded ROMs, which appears to be the source of the complaint.

  • source
  • hideshow 7 child comments
  • [–] 15 points 1 year ago (5 children)

    then shouldn't the people making/selling those handhelds be prosecuted?

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 5 child comments
  • [–] [S] 7 points 1 year ago (3 children)

    Also no? The protection of a multi national company should not be going this far.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 3 child comments
  • [–] 4 points 1 year ago (2 children)

    As an anti-capitalist I think the protection of any company should be global but also that their rights to protection should be practically non-existent.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] 7 points 1 year ago

    It depends on the laws in the country where they're produced and who are importing them to the dystopian country of Italy.

    Most likely it is legal/greyzone where it was produced and was purchased online or sent per agreement as review/sponsored consoles so it's easy to argue the YouTuber have imported illegal goods...

  • source
  • parent
  • [–] 4 points 1 year ago (2 children)

    A half way decent lawyer would get this thrown out before discovery. There is no way they intended to purchase preloaded cards with the handheld.

  • source
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • 84 comments in c/games@lemmy.world view that post
    4 comments in c/retrohandhelds@sh.itjust.works view that post
    4 comments in c/technology@lemmy.zip view that post
    3 comments in c/DeclineIntoCensorship@lemmy.dbzer0.com view that post