all 7 comments

sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] 47 points 1 month ago

What is missing in that article is that blocking globally also might open Quad9 to liability in case of overblocking or falsely reported domains, which has happened in every country which has given rightholders the tools to demand blocks without judicial oversight.

  • source
  • [–] 45 points 1 month ago

    Know DNS isn't the most glamorous bit of infrastructure, but quad9 have been doing good work for a long time. This is exactly what I'd expect from them and why I trust them. Glad to see it.

  • source
  • [–] 24 points 1 month ago* (last edited 1 month ago)

    Oof (to the fact that they might need to move out of France). And right after Mullvad decided to shut down their public DNS servers and recommended Quad9.

  • source
  • [–] 3 points 1 month ago (2 children)

    Am I the only one that has problems when using Quad9 as a forwarder?

    I've tried multiple times and it would mostly work but I would sometimes have problems with random legit domains returning NXDOMAIN, and then start working later in the day.

  • source
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] 1 point 1 month ago

    In practical terms, what does this mean for a Q9 user in France? That they have to set it up via DOH?

  • source