1 comment

sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] 0 points 1 month ago* (last edited 1 month ago)

Not to say that this is a good business model, but these numbers don’t tell the whole story. Somebody smarter than me could explain how while the company is operating at a loss, it’s not as bad as $42B, which is mostly the valuation of investor shares going up. More like $8B because it costs more to operate than revenue, however, revenue increase from 2024 to 2025 did outpace operating loss by quite a lot.

Either way, they made about $4.5B in revenue and probably won’t pay taxes on it.

  • source
  • 6 comments in c/usa@lemmy.ml view that post
    [–] 11 points 1 month ago (3 children)

    So..

    Are we more worried that this nonsense collapses the global economy before this nonsense destroys the fabric of our social society before this nonsense lands a laser-guided smart munition on your personal residence before this nonsense rat-fucks all free elections forever before this nonsense uses up all the viable fresh water source before this nonsense pumps out enough thermal energy to destroy what's left of the biosphere...

    Or, are we just worried that, even after watching the Terminator franchise, some cunt is going to stick a shotgun on the back of that Boston Dynamic robot dog and tell ChatGPT too kill whoever it wants?

  • source
  • hideshow 3 child comments
  • [–] 6 points 1 month ago (2 children)

    Just wanted to say: try not to blame AI for the upcoming crash.
    They manipulated the market using marketing for AI, selling empty promises: it is not the aimless random output machine's fault.
    It is just a tool being used as a smoke screen so no one will blame big money for what they intentionally caused to happen.

    The prompt machines are without agency - it isn't responsible for the human greed that builds these data centers. It isn't responsible for the water they use to keep it going - that's again human intention and greed - AI doesn't deserve being the villain because it is just zeros and ones and not a person.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] 4 points 1 month ago (1 child)

    ai is turning into a scapegoat that westerners chose to blame instead of laying the blame on the people who wield it to these ends and it feels very american to attack the mask rather than ever spend time considering the face behind it.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 1 child comment
  • [–] 2 points 1 month ago

    I like bow everything is the AIs fault. The loss of hobs: AI. The too expensive tokens: Ai. AI hacking systems, AI causing people to go vrazy. The datacenters, ram, gpu everything is blamed on AI.
    And not the real culprit: Human greed. Nothing what's going on is the AI's fault. It is a box that does nothing without a human.

  • source
  • parent
  • [–] 2 points 1 month ago (1 child)

    Where does all the money go? Who gets it in the end?

  • source
  • hideshow 1 child comment
  • 1 comment in c/hackernews@lemmy.bestiver.se view that post
    [–] 1 point 1 month ago

    No paywall: https://www.msn.com/en-us/money/companies/exclusive-anthropics-ipo-prospectus-shows-sweeping-ai-vision-surging-costs/ar-AA2d9ZN1

    Sept 28 (Reuters) - Anthropic is making a massive bet that AI will transform the global economy more profoundly than industrialization, electricity and the internet, according to its IPO prospectus seen by Reuters.

    But the cost to get there will be staggering. Anthropic reported a net loss of $42 billion in 2025, and plans to spend $518 billion on cloud, computing and infrastructure obligations in coming years, according to the prospectus.

    The prospectus details how the company has grown sharply in the last year — while also posting wider losses. Revenue grew 12-fold in 2025 to nearly $4.6 billion, even as the company lost more than $8 billion on an operating basis, excluding writedowns of various liabilities mostly tied to previous fundraising, according to the documents, reported here for the first time

    So typical billionaire mode, aka Bezos-Musk-Gates model.

  • source