1 comment

sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] 6 points 1 month ago*

After spying on communications between scientists? Sure.

Despite Anthropic’s comparisons to Crispr, it remains unclear whether the discovery will have any practical applications, let alone be as transformative as the gene-editing technology.

They don't even know what they discovered 😑

  • source
  • 13 comments in c/technology@lemmy.world view that post
    [–] 20 points 1 month ago (2 children)

    Why does the phrase “Anthropic’s biolab” make me immediately think of zombie movies?

  • source
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] 18 points 1 month ago

    yawn... let us know when the actual human scientists actually verify it, and figure out a use for it. In a world where we already have an excess of bored media producers releasing. "Scientists think this might lead to a cure for cancer". Highlighting some piece of research at stage .0001 of determining if there's even a direction to work with, now we've got reporting coming giving us something at the stage before it gets to the scientists that can start speculating on whether it might lead to something.

  • source
  • [–] 12 points 1 month ago (1 child)
  • [–] 8 points 1 month ago

    Ah yes, we must be getting closer to their IPO date.

  • source
  • [–] 2 points 1 month ago (3 children)

    Why does that robot have a butthole for a face?

  • source
  • hideshow 3 child comments
  • [–] 2 points 1 month ago

    Article links to a biased source and there is no outside fact checking.

    I suppose "Anthropic says" is accurate, but is it really newsworthy besides clicks and ad revenue to report on hearsay?

  • source
  • 1 comment in c/artificial_intel@lemmy.ml view that post
    [–] 2 points 1 month ago*

    do not inject ai slop into your body, regardless of what the ai company says.

  • source