I'm no military strategist, but normally if a country threatens to take over your territory you don't let them build military bases there.
post
Anyone else reading this like it's Sid Meier's Civilization and this is just stacking military units in an "ally's" territory before the inevitable betrayal?
I mean seriously. Come on now.
I feel bad for the PMs that had to be that close. When my cat would eat something he's not supposed to and shit himself I couldn't clean it without a P100 mask or I'd gag and almost puke.
Ok, so is there lava dome that the bases can be built on top of, so that it will be a simple matter of collapsing the dome to destroy them in one fell swoop? Just asking, as a friend.
With whose money?
I knew that Europe would cave in the end. Spineless wimps. And before anyone thinks this is praising the USA, fuck off, I hate both Europe AND the USA: you're both neocolonialist, imperialist, genocidal assholes.
Denmark rolled over and showed their asshole so hard and quick.
Denmark has given nothing more than the USA already had access to
This is just Trump trying to make a nothing deal look like a win
I really don't understand how some of y'all have this conclusion. It don't matter if it was already allowed. It doesn't matter how the deal was already written. That's irrelevant. This is how fascism works. They won a victory, now they get to claim a big victory, now they're going to do whatever the fuck they want because paper treaties don't matter to them.
This ain't new shit people. Did none of y'all pay attention in school?
We well see. Once greenland energy starts drilling when they don't have permission, we well see.
Classic Denmark apologist response.
Call it what you want.
The main (new) point of the deal is that Greenland has to remain a part of NATO if it at some point become a seperate country.
The rest of the chamber to the existing deal were mostly formalities and definitions of things that already could have been passed with the existing deal. Both the points about establishing more bases and using drones.
I don't know, why you are so angry at Denmark but to be honest I don't really care. But this deal is good diplomatic work with a president who is highly unpredictable and illogical
I mean, getting two extra military bases of a nation that has demonstrated itself to be highly violent, invading neighbors and threatening to invade allies, seems like a bad deal. Almost as bad a deal as buying military equipment from them that they have a kill-switch for.
When a nation is rapidly sliding towards fascism, maintaining business as usual is short-sighted. Europe should be preparing for the possibility of US aggression, possibly coordinated with Russia.
Couldn't they build the bases anyway?
Yep. These idiots are just mad that Schitler gets what looks like a win. The US has gained nothing.
I don't know, why you are so angry at Denmark but to be honest I don't really care. But this deal is good diplomatic work with a president who is highly unpredictable and illogical
Appeasing Trump and giving him something he can spin as a "win" (even if it isn't one in reality as you said) increases his power and makes him an even bigger problem for everyone in the long run.
📽️
all 64 comments