The agency launched an investigation in February 2020 after receiving multiple complaints from consumer rights organizations. It examined three Google features that were active during the GDPR application period from May 25, 2018, through February 4, 2020.

The features cover permissions that allowed Google to process users’ web and app activity, location history, and location accuracy data:

Web and App Activity – A setting for Google Account holders that allows Google to process activity across its services, potentially including browsing history, search history, and location data.
Location History – An opt-in service that tracks users carrying compatible mobile devices. It can infer visited places, activities, and routes, and displays this information through a private Google Maps Timeline, even when the user is not actively using a Google service.
Location Accuracy – An Android feature that helps a device determine its position more accurately than GPS alone. It is available regardless of whether the user has a Google Account.

The DPC found that Google processed location data through Web & App Activity and Location History without meeting the GDPR’s requirements. At the same time, the company failed to demonstrate compliance with GDPR principles when processing personal data through Location Accuracy.

all 2 comments

sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] 8 points 1 month ago (1 child)

So that's why they removed the Location History feature and tucked it to the mobile app in the most stupid way possible

  • source
  • hideshow 1 child comment
  • 3 comments in c/technology@lemmy.zip view that post
    [–] 11 points 1 month ago

    Alphabet, the parent company of Google, reported a 298% rise in net income to $112.1bn for the second quarter of 2026 (Q2 2026), compared to $28.2bn in the same period the previous year.

    Barely a drop in the bucket. Just the price of doing business.

  • source
  • [–] 10 points 1 month ago (1 child)

    These fines need to increase by like a factor of 100, or key decision makers need to see serous jail time.

  • source
  • hideshow 1 child comment
  • [–] 6 points 1 month ago

    Bingo on the second point especially. The whole idea of only "punishing" the corporation and not holding key people accountable is insane. If the board room discussion went from "this may earn us a fine" to "this may earn each of us 10-15 years in prison", I think there'd be a lot less corporate shit like this.

  • source
  • parent