all 13 comments

sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] 26 points 1 month ago

And, starting Jan 1. People on Medicaid are going to be required to have a job to keep Medicaid. They can also volunteer or enroll in classes.

Very few will be able to do this, not because they won't, but because no one will hire them, regardless of skills. Volunteer opportunities are few in some communities, and classes are expensive.

More old people will die because of this, but of course, NOT the old people who passed the Big Beautiful Bill.

  • source
  • [–] 13 points 1 month ago (6 children)

    Only 6 years away for me. Exciting times!

  • source
  • hideshow 6 child comments
  • [–] 8 points 1 month ago (5 children)

    i had this realization a while ago and it made me chose a union shop because of it -- it's probably the closest i'm going to get to retirement.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 5 child comments
  • [–] 8 points 1 month ago (4 children)

    I’m in tech myself and somehow still employed. Mostly because I got into the field early and have like 18+ years under my belt. I have friends that have since left the field entirely and this feels like it will be my last tech job.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 4 child comments
  • [–] 5 points 1 month ago (3 children)

    same here on all accounts except it's been 22 years for me and the knowledge that my autism scares off most employers makes me aware that it won't be my choice that this is my last tech job.

    Mostly because I got into the field early ..

    i'm convinced that's how i got started in the first place -- i didn't have the education or experience, but i knew how to recompile a kernel and knew what bash was so i got hired at a time when there was a deep enough labor shortage for people in the field. it makes me feel sorry for the people graduating today since the fields are so saturated today.

    the funniest/worst part is that i was a software engineer for over 10 years of it -- but kept earning and IT salary because of my lack of experience. so i could have been well off enough to survive my 50's+ years if someone had just told me or if levels.fyi had existed sooner. lol

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 3 child comments
  • [–] 3 points 1 month ago (2 children)

    I followed kind of a similar path. I didn’t go to school or anything for programming. It was my natural learning path from the graphic design field after seeing how web development was blowing up. On top of that, my dad was an MS-DOS nerd, so he had me navigating a terminal when I was like 12. So I never needed hand-holding at jobs. I was definitely underpaid for quite a while before I started connecting more and more with others in the field.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] 3 points 1 month ago (1 child)

    i envy you for your dad. mine was convinced that the computer would rot my brain. lol

    edit: now that i think of it, i think he was right. lmao

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 1 child comment
  • [–] 11 points 1 month ago (3 children)

    Euthanasia booths will be provided for over-50s who have failed to use their competitive years to accumulate sufficient wealth to live off passive income

  • source
  • hideshow 3 child comments
  • [–] 7 points 1 month ago

    "I feel invisible" hurts so much. I feel the same that I will never get the job. At least, I am privileged, but most people are not.

  • source
  • 22 comments in c/news@lemmy.world view that post
    [–] 42 points 1 month ago

    My colleagues think I must like my work because I've been there so long; no, it’s just that the older I get, the lower my chances of being able to find another job. No one’s going to hire a 63 year old without very specialized skills.

  • source
  • [–] 73 points 1 month ago (4 children)

    I don't think this is limited to over-50s...

  • source
  • hideshow 4 child comments
  • [+] -22 points 1 month ago (3 children)

    No but these are the same people telling younger generations to pull themselves up by their bootstraps lol. So it’s just interesting to see them getting a taste of what it’s like out there. It fucking sucks and needs a change.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 3 child comments
  • [–] 28 points 1 month ago (2 children)

    You're confusing gen x for boomers.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] 26 points 1 month ago

    Ageism is a plague on the workplace. I see it everywhere.

  • source
  • [–] 13 points 1 month ago

    When some of your work skills are no longer relevant so they start treating you the way they treat young people just stepping into the work force. Next they'll start saying that they don't deserve a living wage (or are they already saying that?).

    This is why worker solidarity is a must. They'll make you starve for their bottom line.

  • source
  • [–] 31 points 1 month ago (3 children)

    So… over 50s are starting to face the reality that under-50s have been dealing with since the over-50s were hunting for their first job?

  • source
  • hideshow 3 child comments
  • [–] 14 points 1 month ago (2 children)

    I love how quickly an issue gen-x was experiencing is suddenly about someone else.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] 4 points 1 month ago*

    We truly are the new invisible generation. I have an ultra specialized job in a hyper specialized field, but if I lost this job there are less than 20 companies in the entire world who could hire me. And why hire me when you can get a Millennial or Zoomer to do it for 2/3 my cost? They won't be as good or have as wide a network, but they will be good enough .

    And I say this as a man actively training my number 1 to take over the departments I run eventually.

  • source
  • parent
  • [+] -6 points 1 month ago (2 children)

    Boomers centering themselves when job market is just cooked period. Plus they already had full employment and savings through their prime earning years...

    "But Jimmy has two boats... I WANT TWO BOATS TOO!!!!"

  • source
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [+] -17 points 1 month ago* (last edited 1 month ago) (5 children)

    If your job experience is anywhere near the digital field, look into satisfying a need by building a digital product that can earn money for you. Customers don’t care how old you are, they just want to span a needs gap with your product. Bonus if it solves a real business need, as companies can be much more open to spending obscene amounts to save a few pennies. Downside to this is you may have to rely on “spray and pray” - actively developing 10, 20, or even more ideas until either one in particular takes off or until the aggregate income across all is sufficient.


    Edit: people, the digital field has the very lowest barrier to entrance other than ditch-diggers. All you need is a free, second-hand computer and a hosting package that costs a few bucks a month.

    I’m not talking about firing up a 50+ person startup that makes you stupidly wealthy when it’s sold to private equity for millions. If this is what you thought, you’ve got SFB.

    I’m talking about building a stable of 10-30 digital products that, over a year or three of steady visibility, each of them will eventually bring you in a few hundred to a thousand or two dollars of income per month on a consistent basis, especially if it’s a product that has a legitimate server/online component that demands an ongoing subscription.

    Down that second path you have the opportunity to make a comfortable and very liveable wage by NOT putting all your eggs (effort, resources) into one bag, thereby diversifying your income in ways that doesn’t demand daily, ongoing, persistent labour.

    Will it make you wealthy? Almost assuredly not. But it will put food on your table, a roof over your head, and give you a reasonably comfortable life without wearing the shackles of needing to be wildly profitable to someone else.

  • source
  • hideshow 5 child comments
  • [–] 13 points 1 month ago (2 children)
  • [–] -1 points 1 month ago*

    Regular entrepreneurship, sure.

    Digital products, not so much. Down that route sits - for most products - three low costs: a computer, your time and effort, and a few bucks in hosting costs a month.

    I’m not talking about creating another Facebook. That’s stupid.

    I’m talking about identifying a really small service gap and punting something out that takes maybe a month of work (at most, the average should be a week for an experienced dev) but which can generate recurring income without any ongoing input from you. It’ll require hosting and a little upkeep as bugs and edge cases are identified, but that’s all of the ongoing costs.

    This mantra of “bigger, dipshit, bigger” is what drives most projects into the ground. Think small, think limited in scope, think off the beaten path, think easy to build, think cheap to keep up and running, think too small for anyone else to bother becoming a competitor, think clear value for customers.

    If you are wanting to turn this into a 50+ employee operation that makes you filthy fucking rich and where you can eventually sell it off to private equity for millions, you’ve got SFB. That’s not the point.

    The point is to build something that will consistently earn you a living wage without you having to destroy your mind or body working like a dog all the time. It’ll be something that eventually winds down to a few hours a month in maintenance as decently non-trivial - for that time+effort - money continues to roll in

  • source
  • parent
  • [–] 7 points 1 month ago* (1 child)

    imagine you are 55vyo, jobless. pehaps you have almost enough savings to retire. now contemplate investing your remaining money into a startup, knowing the odds of success are low.

    taking that chance could land you homeless with greater probability than being moderately successful.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 1 child comment
  • [–] -1 points 1 month ago

    Who said anything about a startup?

    Tech is one of those industries where one can stand up a digital product with almost no resources aside from time and effort, a computer, and maybe a few bucks in hosting per month.

    And so what if a product gets you only a few hundred in recurring income per month… if you have a dozen or two wildly different ideas working for you, that adds up to several thousand a month.

  • source
  • parent
  • [–] -5 points 1 month ago*

    They need to learn how to game the AI reviewer systems. Find someone that advertises resumes and AI knowledge, even better if they are elder genz.

  • source
  • 9 comments in c/antiwork@lemmy.ca view that post
    [+] 23 points 1 month ago (1 child)
  • [–] 15 points 1 month ago* (1 child)

    This is the job market today, to a large degree. I suppose there may be some amount of age bias, as with anything, but this is how things are lately.

    Here is a step-wise approach to solving the employment crisis (and many others):

    Elon Musk, Larry Page, Jeff Bezos, Sergey Brin, Mark Zuckerberg, Larry Ellison, Bernard Arnault, Jensen Huang, Steve Ballmer, Warren Buffett, Bill Gates, Michael Bloomberg, Amancio Ortega, Michael Dell, Carlos Slim Helú, Mukesh Ambani, Gautam Adani, Francoise Bettencourt Meyers, Julia Koch, Zhong Shanshan

  • source
  • hideshow 1 child comment
  • [–] 7 points 1 month ago

    Capitalism throws away the sick and the old.

  • source
  • [–] 4 points 1 month ago

    Ageism has been an issue for a long time, but becomes more noticeable in the lean years. My friend was just canned on day 89, and she's 55, whip-smart and finished an MBA this year focused on machine learning and its application in finance (not a slouch or a fogey).

    It's a challenge since the people who were mentored are now easier to ignore. Hope to fuck I never need a heart machine because I've seen who's gonna be writing their firmware.

  • source
  • [–] 6 points 1 month ago

    Have they tried showing up in person, asking to see the manager and giving them a strong handshake?

    Or is it that the job market has been fucked for a while.

  • source
  • [–] 3 points 1 month ago

    Only job security is to make VP.

  • source
  • [–] 1 point 1 month ago

    hundreds of applications and a handful of interviews? they're doing better than younger people, then.

  • source
  • 1 comment in c/usa@midwest.social view that post
    [–] 4 points 1 month ago

    There are only 2 groups of people struggling to find work in the US: 50+and under-50s.

  • source