all 19 comments

sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] 32 points 1 month ago (9 children)

Its absolutely nuts if they launch this without the ability to stream from their own, Linux-based, hardware.

The article doesnt explicity state that foveated streaming is nor supported on Linux, but it does go.our of it's way to mention Windows in every instance it mentions streaming.

  • source
  • hideshow 9 child comments
  • [–] 29 points 1 month ago

    "Your Steam Frame headset easily pairs with your Steam Controller; you’ll even see a virtual Steam Controller floating in your VR space. Stream from your PC, laptop, Steam Deck or Steam Machine for an immersive experience with any of your favorite games."

    So I take that as it does stream from Linux,

  • source
  • parent
  • [–] 5 points 1 month ago (6 children)

    I owned 2 quest headsets. The only time I used streaming was for alyx, and that runs natively here.

    Even in Windows, I struggled getting streaming working on quest.

    It's not as big a deal for many like me as people think

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 6 child comments
  • [–] 12 points 1 month ago (3 children)

    PC VR is a major part of the VR market, so it is important. I would never pay a single cent to Meta, so I have only used PC VR.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 3 child comments
  • [–] 3 points 1 month ago* (2 children)

    If the games ran on the headset directly though, would you still bother with PC VR?

    that was the problem with the meta quest. Steam Frame is a proper computer, and you could even use different stores.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] 5 points 1 month ago (1 child)

    I'll play a few games on it directly, which will be convenient, but I also understand that I can't strap a big RTX GPU to my head like the one in my desktop.

    They are simply 2 different levels of VR experience. Also I can run Elden Ring in VR on the PC, and a lot of other VR mods.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 1 child comment
  • [–] 3 points 1 month ago*

    Even in Windows, I struggled getting streaming working on quest.

    Ironically, streaming is better on Linux these days with the full open source stack (wivrn + xrizer) than it is on Windows.

    Hopefully, the Frame will at least support wivrn at launch (which should in theory as it's just an android apk on the client side).

  • source
  • parent
  • [–] 29 points 1 month ago* (last edited 1 month ago) (3 children)

    And you call it Steam Frame despite it clearly being grilled.

  • source
  • hideshow 3 child comments
  • [–] 22 points 1 month ago

    Avoiding Meta’s platform lock-in isn’t worth the hundreds of extra dollars Valve is seeking for its unsubsidized VR hardware

    Avoiding Meta is THE EXACT reason it's worth hundreds more.

  • source
  • [–] 14 points 1 month ago (3 children)

    I don't understand the desire to not use a desktop PC for all the power it provides, but I'm not an everyday normal consumer. For a wireless VR set attached to a computer, it sounds lovely-- I'd like a cheaper, gutted version that's strictly for streaming.

    But I suppose for now, I can stick to my Index, especially with prices for parts the way they are. I still much prefer it over Quest 3, tether and all.

  • source
  • hideshow 3 child comments
  • [–] 10 points 1 month ago

    This will make an awesome travel computer. Still capable of playing games, but also a giant screen for movies or even desktop work.

    A lot of hotels make hooking up the steam deck to the tv a pain so this way I won’t have to deal with it anymore.

  • source
  • parent