all 20 comments

sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] 19 points 1 month ago (5 children)

Hey, you absolute fuckers: if this is even remotely true, why the fuck are you not sabotaging this shit? You, as the researchers? Poison data, manipulate algorithms, fucking bomb the data centers, but do something.

  • source
  • hideshow 5 child comments
  • [–] 12 points 1 month ago (1 child)

    There's been multiple pretty interesting exposés on this. The TL;DR is that a lot of the high profile figures in the AI space have a god complex where they believe AI is inevitable and by being involved in the development, they might be able to steer it in a better direction. So really, the classic "if I don't, someone else will" excuse.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 1 child comment
  • [–] 2 points 1 month ago

    Or just put useable guardrails on it.

    I have to use Claude for work, if they were actually worried about safety it would be far easier to control the permissions of processes instead they basically let you filter strings that it executed in a subshell.

    Modern computing systems can be pretty fine grained around network and systemcall access (including inheritance to prevent escapes), none of these tools do that, because this is just marketing not real fear.

  • source
  • parent
  • [–] 17 points 1 month ago (1 child)

    I feel like their contributions to climate change make this true.

  • source
  • hideshow 1 child comment
  • [–] 31 points 1 month ago (5 children)
  • [–] 7 points 1 month ago (4 children)

    Who do you suppose they are marketing to? People who want to die? People who want to see an extinction event?

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 4 child comments
  • [–] 3 points 1 month ago

    Anyone and everyone, though firstly a credulous media… in order to contribute to the huge scam: that this is a product which has some value commensurate with the spending, let alone has any utility. Falsely claiming this faulty overbloated software product is intelligent is their sales proposition in the first place, so messaging that its ‘going rogue’ , acting of its own accord, and other such bs contributes to that. The lack of decent questioning journalism , rather than parrotting pr statements, makes this very cheap marketing but almost almost at zeitgeist level.

  • source
  • parent
  • [–] 11 points 1 month ago
    [–] 5 points 1 month ago

    The more senior the employee, the more concerned they are

    Peter principal lol

  • source
  • [–] 4 points 1 month ago

    Not soon enough.

  • source
  • [–] 3 points 1 month ago

    Humans could cause extinction of AI companies and their investors.

    And it's always "could". Not that it will, nothing specific, just bubble blowing bluffing and bamboozling.

  • source
  • [–] 5 points 1 month ago

    oh, ...better invest now!

  • source
  • [–] 2 points 1 month ago

    Hyperbole, but still, I wonder what sort of world I'm bringing my child up into.

  • source