We already know AGI isn’t possible with LLM technology but looking past this, what I despise in the current state of AI tech journalism is the loop of:

• AI stakeholder/spokesperson says something unrealistic
• Journalist nods their head approvingly
• Article is virtually an ad that recounts an event
• Rinse and repeat

Too many tech enthusiasts masquerading as ‘journalists’ who seemingly suffer from short-term memory loss.

It’s like i’m seeing the same information on repeat because ‘journalists’ fall for the same marketing tactics endlessly and do little to actually question what they hear.

Pro tip:

If you have to make press releases to convince people AGI is here, it is not here.

It's always maybe with this stuff. Why is it even different from the previous iterations?

Well it has to happen to juice the IPO, right?

Deja vu, i've heard of those words before

https://archive.ph/nbHMo

Snake oil

Didn't the last 9 models do that

Pay walled