74
[META] Whatever happened to images like these..? (notes in post) (media.piefed.social)
submitted 2 months ago by to c/lego@lemmy.world
5 comments fedilink hide all child comments
 

This is certainly dating me, but I used to see loads of lovely diorama interiors online, both real-life and CG-produced, around 25-30yrs ago. For example medieval castles, Dungeons&Dragons-type fantasy scenarios, and lush, detailed historical settings that filled up the entire screen, making the viewer feel that they were inside the sets. Wallpaper material, one might say. The feel was like in the OP, as well as maybe this one:


https://www.trustedreviews.com/wp-content/uploads/sites/7/2008/06/7832-Indy1-1.jpg

Again, the cropping made you feel like you were inside the piece, as opposed to it being a build sitting on a table or whatnot, like so:


https://media-cdn.brothers-brick.com/2024/08/454274351_426756699686176_4509296452969578543_n-640x428.jpg

Not sure if anyone knows or remembers what I'm talking about, but my basic question is just-- anybody have source for stuff like the former..?

all 5 comments

sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] 2 points 2 months ago* (2 children)

I'm not sure of a source. These are cool. They probably dwindled when instructions were added to the Legos.

  • permalink
  • fedilink
  • source
  • hideshow 2 child comments
    •
  • [–] [S] 5 points 2 months ago* (last edited 2 months ago)

    I'm thinking in particular the CG ones, made in Blender or whatever it was, back in the day. ("Milkshape"...?)

    I would have thought that with 25yrs of software advances, the fake dioramas would be better than ever, but it's like that particular line of creation just evaporated. (poof!) The thing that's crazy to me is that a lot of the CG LEGO images I was seeing back then were absolutely gorgeous.

    But I guess one possibility is that LEGO communities as a whole came to frown on stuff that wasn't built out of real bricks. So maybe they kind of got policed-out, so to speak?

  • permalink
  • fedilink
  • source
  • parent
    • [–] 1 point 2 months ago (1 child)

    Around 20-30 years ago, people took a little more care in composing a photo, even the amateurs. Hard drive space was still kind of pricey. Smart phones weren't ubiquitous yet. It took some level of real investment to create the kind of photos you miss. Lego landscapes are hard. They're tiny and big at the same time. Focus, depth of field, and lack of a background all work against you in ways a little diorama doesn't. Combine that with more people that haven't actually studied the craft of photography, taking more photos than ever and you get flooded with snapshots. Those lazy snapshots still happened 20-30 years ago to be sure, but nobody's remembering them because they were forgettable then and forgotten now, kind of a survivorship bias. The same reason people argue that the music they listened to in grade school always was and forever will be the best music.

  • permalink
  • fedilink
  • source
  • hideshow 1 child comment
    •
  • [–] [S] 2 points 2 months ago* (last edited 2 months ago)

    With all due respect, I fear you're combining different phenomena in your analysis.

    nobody’s remembering them because they were forgettable then

    Oh hell, no. The ones I was seeing were absolutely outstanding, which I tried to give y'all a taste of, above. And all the technology to produce them was there, as well.

    Millions of people who love LEGO + software tools + creativity = some REALLY good shit, here and there

  • permalink
  • fedilink
  • source
  • parent