Some key insights from the article:

Basically, what they did was to look at how much batteries would be needed in a given area to provide constant power supply at least 97% of the time, and the calculate the costs of that solar+battery setup compared to coal and nuclear.

no comments (yet)

sorted by: hot top controversial new old
there doesn't seem to be anything here
101 comments in c/technology@lemmy.world view that post
8 comments in c/upliftingnews@lemmy.world view that post