cross-posted from: https://discuss.tchncs.de/post/39964313

Some key insights from the article:

Basically, what they did was to look at how much batteries would be needed in a given area to provide constant power supply at least 97% of the time, and the calculate the costs of that solar+battery setup compared to coal and nuclear.

all 8 comments

sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] 1 point 1 year ago (1 child)
  • [–] 12 points 1 year ago* (5 children)

    We're getting there!

    What about winter in Sweden, for example?

  • source
  • hideshow 5 child comments
  • 101 comments in c/technology@lemmy.world view that post