cross-posted from: https://discuss.tchncs.de/post/39964313

Some key insights from the article:

Basically, what they did was to look at how much batteries would be needed in a given area to provide constant power supply at least 97% of the time, and the calculate the costs of that solar+battery setup compared to coal and nuclear.

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] 4 points 1 year ago

From what I can tell, without. Looks like they used the Lazard LCOE+ standard metric which doesn’t factor in government subsidies.

  • source
  • parent