It's an ass-backwards system. People making small amounts need the money now more!
It should be progressive. The first $x aren't taxed, then the next chunk are taxed a little, then the next chunk more, and so on.
It's an ass-backwards system. People making small amounts need the money now more!
It should be progressive. The first $x aren't taxed, then the next chunk are taxed a little, then the next chunk more, and so on.
If the poor pay relatively more than the rich that sounds like anti-social security to me
Slight modification.
For SS the employer and employee pay 50/50. So the actual number is double that.
If they lifted the cap the person making $5,176,000 would pay $731,369
Let’s stick with that: “scrap”. You know they’ll eventually “compromise” by raising the cap a little, putting the onus on people who earn just a little more without actually affecting the wealthy. Thats not ok. At some point wealthy people need to pay their share
As someone that's maxed out SS most of their carrier while simultaneously assuming I'll never get SS I'm looking at this a little side eye. Just seems like one last party for the boomers here.
top 17 comments