186
London cops handed victim's new address and number to her stalker, watchdog says (www.theregister.com)
submitted 3 months ago by to c/cybersecurity@sh.itjust.works
7 comments fedilink hide all child comments

all 7 comments

sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] 38 points 3 months ago (4 children)

How does that even happen? Why would the police give someones information to anyone?

  • permalink
  • fedilink
  • source
  • hideshow 4 child comments
    •
  • [–] 38 points 3 months ago (3 children)

    Stalker didn't even ask for it. Cops are just incompetent and didn't do the most basic shit, handing the stalker testimony copies with victims addr and phone number

  • permalink
  • fedilink
  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 3 child comments
    •
  • [–] 25 points 3 months ago (2 children)

    And the police wonder why we don't go to them for anything anymore

  • permalink
  • fedilink
  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
    •
    • [–] 6 points 3 months ago

    Birds of a feather

  • permalink
  • fedilink
  • source
    •
    [–] 6 points 3 months ago

    My own personal experience with specifically the City Of London police is that they're very incompetent.

  • permalink
  • fedilink
  • source
    •
    6 comments in c/pulse_of_truth@infosec.pub view that post
    [–] 14 points 3 months ago (5 children)

    Despite warnings that all personal information had to be redacted from the copy handed to the defendant, officers included unredacted witness statements and other documents.

    So, how much is malice and how much incompetence

  • permalink
  • fedilink
  • source
  • hideshow 5 child comments
    •
  • [–] 7 points 3 months ago* (last edited 3 months ago) (3 children)

    Honestly every time a true crime doc I'm watching has happened to be in the UK the cops have astounded me with how painfully, brain shatteringly incompetent they are. And I'm a fuckin american 😅

  • permalink
  • fedilink
  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 3 child comments
    •
  • [–] 6 points 3 months ago (2 children)

    Between burnout, and underpay, they lose the more intelligent ones quite quickly.

    A few years back, I did some work for a UK police force, as a (sub)contractor. One of the other guys actually asked the Chief constable why they were using us, not doing it in-house. It turned out they tried. Every time they trained up officers to do it, they quickly jumped ship to the private sector.

    Plus side, excessive machoism is discouraged too, so the police tend to be a lot more polite than American police. Effectiveness is another story.

  • permalink
  • fedilink
  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
    •
  • [–] 3 points 3 months ago (1 child)

    Thanks for the insight! Always interesting to hear from people with actual perspective

  • permalink
  • fedilink
  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 1 child comment
    •
  • [–] 3 points 3 months ago

    From what I gathered. It's mostly a bunch of decrees coming down from central government. "Cost savings" from people who don't have day to day interactions with the police ok the street.

    E.g. buying a dedicated forensics vehicle, in one hit was not allowed. They cost too much. However, contracting for 1, on a case by case basis is fine. Despite the average cost being 1-2x the cost of a new one per year (they apparently last at least 10 years).

    Wage pressure also makes them choose between more officers or paying the existing ones better. When there is a hard limit of the number of officers needed, the officers get screwed.

  • permalink
  • fedilink
  • source
  • parent