-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA512

I wonder what percentage of the tools available take the
materials under test and ship them back to a third party over
the internet for authentication?  Is it wise to send information
from an anonymous source to an unknown third party for testing?
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----

iHUEARYKAB0WIQQ5Ze8lWN4nvfBX69bRgA6DVqFEVAUCamxLFAAKCRDRgA6DVqFE
VPqrAQDZ/pkiEFq9skU86ztnON2xb3ZxSp/OD31wuSPNdVEfJQD/axrJ+L+ZnA3O
4h55xdMfz8eIa78fYKioKhMsUKVlsQA=
=Gyfy
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----

In fairness, a lot of news organisations are run without input from adequate journalists.

Why on earth would a journalist need to have input on authentication tools??

Surely this would be more suited for a cybersecurity expert?

Not that I’d trust an AI-based authentication system anyway.

Rule 2.