all 43 comments

sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] 73 points 3 months ago

I'm shocked it isn't the other way around chronologically. Good on Milan

  • source
  • [–] 54 points 3 months ago

    How terrible! Think of all the lost ad revenue!

  • source
  • [–] 46 points 3 months ago (5 children)
  • [–] 9 points 3 months ago (2 children)

    What's really dumb about Time Square is that the buildings are legally required to have illuminated signs, originally created under the guise of public safety in 1980s to keep the busy area will lit. These days the claim is about the historic look...

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] 29 points 3 months ago

    will someone please think of the shareholders??

  • source
  • [–] 15 points 3 months ago

    1985 looks pretty cool in some ways.

    It's like Milan was intentionally attempting to create a sight like Times Square.

    But then they realised emulating that wasn't a good fit, and leaning into the history they did have was much better.

  • source
  • [–] 14 points 3 months ago (8 children)

    I wonder what Times Square would look like without the ads.

  • source
  • hideshow 8 child comments
  • [–] 11 points 3 months ago (4 children)
  • [–] 2 points 3 months ago* (3 children)
  • [–] 4 points 3 months ago (2 children)
  • [–] 8 points 3 months ago

    Unshittification?

  • source
  • [–] 6 points 3 months ago

    Milan vs Milan with uBlock

  • source
  • [–] 6 points 3 months ago

    The architect must have been rolling in their grave.

  • source
  • [–] 6 points 3 months ago*

    Oof. It's like a nice stately gentleman, with a huge Bass Pro Shops logo tattooed to his forehead. Much better now.

  • source
  • [–] 6 points 3 months ago (1 child)

    They took the ads off buildings and put them on all your digital devices instead.

  • source
  • hideshow 1 child comment
  • [–] 3 points 3 months ago

    Probably the only thing that got less ads over time, incredible

  • source
  • [–] 2 points 3 months ago

    Funny. The exact opposite is happening at Rådhuspladsen.

  • source
  • [–] 2 points 3 months ago

    Ads everywhere vs ads everywhere BUT

  • source
  • [–] 8 points 3 months ago (9 children)

    I kind of dig it with all the ads. Like aesthetics wise. Just looks like a plain old building now. Just my opinion though.

  • source
  • hideshow 9 child comments
  • [–] 9 points 3 months ago (4 children)

    I think you may just be enjoying classic logo design.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 4 child comments
  • [–] 1 point 2 months ago (1 child)

    Not just the logo design but the design of the actual signs themselves, just the fact that they're actual 3D things rather than a flat sheet makes it sooooo much more appealing.

    Having one or two 80's style signs like the RICOH one is actually a really nice aesthetic IMO, seen it in a couple places and it creates a kind of.. calm big city vibe

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 1 child comment
  • [–] 8 points 3 months ago (3 children)

    It looks like modern internet full of pop ups vs old internet

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 3 child comments
  • [–] -4 points 3 months ago (1 child)

    I like 1985 better. 2025 seems so dull and sad

  • source
  • hideshow 1 child comment
  • [–] 0 points 3 months ago

    Clearly an ad for Milan

  • source
  • [–] -2 points 3 months ago (1 child)

    Obviously ad block makes a difference but if you turn it off of use someone else's computer it's so bad now

  • source
  • hideshow 1 child comment