a four panel comic. first panel shows the engine room with a lot of bean canisters that feed people sticking on a wall. second panel shows a neatly array of the people who just ate beans at the back of a spaceship. in the third panel the captain commands "fart". fourth panel is the spaceship going to fart speed as the people who ate beans fart a green glowing gas cloud

top 38 comments

sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] 1 point 1 year ago

Looking like a very british comic.

  • source
  • [–] 57 points 1 year ago (5 children)

    You'd be amused to hear that "fart" in most Scandinavian languages means speed/movement/travel

    So we have fartpilot, overfart, fartbump, fartkontrol etc

  • source
  • hideshow 5 child comments
  • [–] 32 points 1 year ago (1 child)

    This is not a thing I ever wanted to think about

  • source
  • hideshow 1 child comment
  • [–] 23 points 1 year ago

    Make it so, Number Two!

  • source
  • [–] 18 points 1 year ago

    After the Burn, captains did what they had to do.

  • source
  • [–] 15 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (6 children)

    - "It's simply impossible to go beyond fart factor 10."
    - "Eject the fart core!! (rip)"
    - "I'll execute you just like Tuvix if you ever change the type of beans in my coffee specification again!!"
    - "We monitor for species that are on the verge of achieving the fart-drive technology."
    - "Bean me up, Scotty."
    - "The fart field extends around the ship traveling through fart-warped space, it's like hot-boxing or Dutch ovenning."
    - "Foton torpedo, target their starboard fart-box, on my mark!"
    - "Warning! Incoming fart signatures!!"
    - "Do not reverse the polarity on the engine drive or we will all instantly get pink eye!!"
    - "Who put hot-sauce on the Difarthium crystals?? The ship can't take the extra boost!!"
    - "Wesley, go clean the warp anuses!"

  • source
  • hideshow 6 child comments
  • [–] 1 point 1 year ago (5 children)

    Whoever changed the warp scale in Star Trek: grumble grumble, warp 9 and warp 9.5 sound barely different.

    I dunno about you, but I prefer a scale for velocity where as velocity goes to infinity, so does your scale

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 5 child comments
  • [–] 2 points 1 year ago* (4 children)

    ... all these scales can go to infinity regardless of if they are logarithmic or not (if I understood your complaint correctly).

    And you are right, warp 10 isn't the maximum, just an (energy consumption of that) tech limitation. And also that is very ship-capability specific - eg crew's experience on a warp 7 ship going from 7.0 to 7.5 is not at all comparable in any practical navigational reasons to crew's experience on a warp 9 ship going from 9.0 to 9.5.

    I don't think the warp 10 being infinite by default is cannon tho:

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 4 child comments
  • [–] 2 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (3 children)

    My complaint is that the warp factor only goes to infinity in the first chart you provided (the old system. i.e. as v –> ∞, fw –> ∞). They changed it from v = fw^3^*c. So warp 3 was 27c for TOS and ENT: https://memory-alpha.fandom.com/wiki/Warp_factor

    Warp 10 being infinite is definitely cannon, just ask the haters what the worst episode of Star Trek Voyager is haha

    https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Threshold_(Star_Trek:_Voyager)

    (The headline of this wiki article is a little off, he doesn't travel "faster" than warp 10, he travels at warp 10)

    Your second graph literally says "warp 10 is infinite velocity", which is the new system. That there are 10 energy thresholds is cool world-building, but basing your velocity scale on it is annoying and unintuitive. When they use these numbers, unless you crack open a calculator, you have no idea how fast it actually is.

    In the new system as as v –> ∞, fw –> 10, and I find that annoying.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 3 child comments
  • [–] 3 points 1 year ago (2 children)

    Yeah, I agree with everything, I was just unsure what they said about 10 – my bad on ST lore.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] 11 points 1 year ago (2 children)

    So... which one of you is going to ask Randall Munroe if this is plausible or not? Disregarding the the obvious frozen-butt problem, of course.

  • source
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] 10 points 1 year ago (1 child)

    "Fart" in norwegian means speed so checks out

  • source
  • hideshow 1 child comment
  • [–] 9 points 1 year ago (1 child)
  • [–] 7 points 1 year ago

    Number one.

    Give it the beans.

  • source
  • [–] 5 points 1 year ago

    This is delightfully silly and exactly what I needed given the way my day has gone.

  • source
  • They could still refer to it as the ass-end of the ship

  • source
  • [–] 5 points 1 year ago

    You might be interested in a little movie called Thunderpants!

    It's exactly what you think it is, and surprisingly good!

  • source
  • [–] 4 points 1 year ago

    technically one could simulate this on a holodeck.

  • source
  • [–] 3 points 1 year ago

    Entering trumpspace

  • source
  • [–] 3 points 1 year ago

    This is just star trek that happnes in the universe of the hit 2002 movie Thunderpants.

  • source
  • [–] 5 points 1 year ago (2 children)

    The reality where human technology developed around harnessing the power of farts is a strange one. Still better than ours, though.

  • source
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] 2 points 1 year ago (1 child)

    @Little8Lost This technically counts as green energy. Or is it brown energy?

  • source
  • hideshow 1 child comment
  • I love how the artist matched the skin tones of face and butts between the first two cells.

  • source
  • [–] 1 point 1 year ago

    Space, the final frontier, to boldly go where no fart has gone before...

  • source
  • [–] 0 points 1 year ago

    Why isn't this loss

  • source