Controlled opposition anyone? Reminds me of some of the anecdotal shit that happened around Occupy Wall Street
post
-
Nothing on the internet is real.
-
Don’t feed the trolls.
I feel like if there was a dedicated class in schools worldwide, that just did nothing but teach these two things over and over again, the world would be a better place.
…Because the fundamental issue is that people are believing this guy. And feeding him. He is a troll, making cash being a troll; he cannot help himself. But the public maybe possibly can.
Holy shit that had been what I have been saying from what we learned in the BBS days.
Basically anyway:
- everyone one on the internet is a liar
- stay anonymous, and because everyone else is too: see rule 1
- dont feed the trolls.
That has been my go to for a long time, but then you get people upset and demanding mods censor words and view points and of course advertisers pumping real money to people in exchange for hosting content. So it makes a mess of things :/
What a weird fucking read
we in a simulation.... not that you are wrong about things but just askew. Like everyone. It is just all shaddows dancing on the walls. A unholy puppet show. Edward Bernays butt baby.
This article is a psyop to get people to post real criminal evidence online
Or to get it into the zeitgeist that "all these people complaining about Flock are just lying and doing it for clicks."
How? Are you suggesting that people will now show criminal evidence online just to prove that they got a cease and desist? That would be beyond stupid, and I don't think there's anything in the article that suggests it. There are other ways to prove it, such as asking Flock's legal team (if they say they did, it's because they did), or verifying if the letter has a consistent format and return address with other cease and desist letters that the legal team sent.
If you want to do something, meet people and organize. Do not follow influencers on Instagram.
Reminds me of DNC funded leftist breadtubers. A whole arse sea of dildos to employ on both sides to farm outrage. Some got a whole team of marketurds. We in the matrix. Really it is an attempt to co opt the conversation to deflate the real opposition so they can ram it through. Both parties want this. IT i$ A mAtTuRd oF nAti()nAl sEcuRitUrdY.... nOw g0 tO jAiL Fooooooorever.
I, uh, definitely would have worded this with more care, but if anyone believes their side is somehow immune to corporate interests funding or manipulating drama and outrage? It's dumb to think that the rich sociopaths would uniquely mess with one political side while leaving another completely alone.
Nothing to do with any side being right, wrong, better, or worse. Everything to do with rish assholes being rich assholes.
uuuhhhh oh downvote turdz... the wave of disapproval. 😵
Hey, if dumbasses decided to be a problematic thorn in the side of flock, even though they're doing it stupidly- I say we let them. At least time spent ranting about flock is time NOT spent using smart glasses to record women on the street or running "pranks" on the sidewalk?
Oh no, the poor poor technofascist panopticon megacorp, how ever will they recover from such misinformation?
The unfortante thing if how this is reported is that "fake cease and disit from flock" will be many peoples take away and not that flock is doing this henious shit but this one influencet is pretending its happebing to him
all 25 comments