top 17 comments

sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] 24 points 3 months ago (15 children)

It effects the poorest people most, which should be the reason everyone hates it, no matter your personal choice of media.

Buying used games at the pawn shop, borrowing from your library or friend, etc is right and good.

Publishers doing day 1 patches, etc is not an excuse to justify abolishing access.

  • source
  • hideshow 15 child comments
  • [–] 5 points 3 months ago

    In fact, day 1 patches should either not be a thing, or cost as much as a voluntary recall of the first batches of disks did in 2005.

    Instead of being happy they don't need to spend billions to prevent a fiasco, they squirm at the thought of someone not going through their racket to get a loicence.

    A legislated digital refresh on the second hand disc market would be nice consumer protection policy. But no, community servers are too much to ask for from these fucks.

  • source
  • parent
  • [+] -6 points 3 months ago (13 children)
  • [–] 6 points 3 months ago (8 children)

    The market conditions are very unique right now since this is caused by all the AI-slop, and consoles going up in price like this has never happened before. If we think long-term though, i think it will still apply like it used to.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 8 child comments
  • [–] 0 points 3 months ago (4 children)

    The market conditions are not unique - this is the new normal. Do you really think the Trump admin is going after the RAM cartel? That was the past, open corruption is the new standard

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 4 child comments
  • [–] 2 points 3 months ago (2 children)

    You know Trump won't always be in office, right? He isn't a permanent fixture. Best case scenario, he croaks today, worst case scenario, he's out in another two and a half years. Granted I'm not exactly expecting miracles of whoever comes next, but they couldn't be much worse than the overinflated oompah loompah.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] 1 point 3 months ago (2 children)

    I think people downvoting you don't realize you don't like the current situation. But it's real. Shit's real bad right now, Sony wants every dollar they can get a hold of. This hobby is now a luxury the majority of people will not be able to enjoy, and it sucks badly.

    I really don't know of any way this industry can sustain this. How will gamers, Sony and the rest endure this level of enshittification?

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [+] 0 points 3 months ago (1 child)
  • [–] 2 points 3 months ago

    Consoles used to be the cheaper option. PS2 at launch in 2000 was $300. A pc in the year 2000 cost about $600 or more if you were putting together a gaming rig.

    The PS5 is $650, and that's still less expensive than a gaming pc. Minimum spend for a gaming rig would be $800 or more.

    The reality is that consoles were the most in reach option for poor people, and maybe they still are.

    I suspect that people who really really can't afford the hobby on console will turn to roms on much older PCs.

  • source
  • parent
  • [–] 9 points 3 months ago*

    The resale market is precisely what they want to kill. Can't sell a game twice if one copy can be played by two people. Can't profit from nostalgia with a retro re-release (that will inevitably be shittier than the original) if the original retro game can still be played.

  • source
  • [–] 2 points 3 months ago

    At least it's in the article: in the case of Sony everything is tied to hardware. You can't control the hardware or use it in novel ways. It's just a bad choice, disc or no disc.

  • source
  • 2 comments in c/gaming@lemmy.zip view that post
    [–] 6 points 3 months ago

    May as well say

  • source
  • [–] 6 points 3 months ago

    It doesnt “threaten” the market. It eliminates it. Of course, that’s been a goal of all publishers across all media for decades. Sony is just the first games publisher to take the lesson from textbook publishers and eliminate physical media that a buyer actually owns.

  • source