Infrastructure analyst Alon Levy has written a lot about this issue in their blog. A lot of it comes down to aversions to maintaining in-house expertise in government agencies (preferring outsourcing to contractors) and (particularly in the US) an exceptionalist belief that there is nothing to learn from other (implicitly lesser and/or culturally alien) countries.
post
Interesting how Singapore and Hong Kong are part of the list. Are they really considered part of the anglosphere? And yes, I know English is also spoken there.
Singapore specifically is, everyone under 45 speaks English. And more than 50% speak English above age 45. They drive same as the English, they have the same plugs as the English. Places in Singapore are named after the brits custom even after they left. Not sure what more needs be added to be qualified into being anglosphere
Not sure either, as normalized definitions change over time (i.e. first/third world). I glanced at wikipedia and Singapore isn’t even considered part of the outer sphere there: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Anglosphere.
I guess if you just go by the “countries where english is widely spoken” definition, then it fits. But even then, Hong Kong doesn’t really fit that. The Philippines also speaks English, moreso than Hong Kong, but I guess their public transportation build cost doesn’t meet the criteria for expensive.
Yeah it sounds like Singapore may have different reasons for thier higher costs; https://www.channelnewsasia.com/singapore/comparing-singapores-newest-and-oldest-mrt-lines-5745191
How does one open the links in the youtube description? They all seem curtailed. I just need to see the spreadsheet or a tldw.
I assume in the UK it's mostly It's land acquisition costs, stemming from a long lasting guillotine shortage. And also probably fragmenting the projects into 50 hierarchical contract layers that with each party taking its dumb "risk-adjusted" rate of return.
Tldw:

Some unshortened links:
University of Toronto report about transit costs in Canada, which Jedwin Mok is an author on: https://onedrive.live.com/?id=%2Fpersonal%2F4581db26fec1b7aa%2FDocuments%2FHome%2FOD+Building+Beautifully%2FTransit+Cost+Crisis%2FFiles%2FUnderstanding-the-Drivers-of-Transit-Construction-Costs-in-Canada_Feb-2025_FINAL.pdf&listurl=%2Fpersonal%2F4581db26fec1b7aa%2FDocuments&ithint=file%2Cpdf&e=rrya6P&migratedtospo=true&parent=%2Fpersonal%2F4581db26fec1b7aa%2FDocuments%2FHome%2FOD+Building+Beautifully%2FTransit+Cost+Crisis%2FFiles&redeem=aHR0cHM6Ly8xZHJ2Lm1zL2IvYy80NTgxZGIyNmZlYzFiN2FhL0lRQnVSTk1EN0JBdlJZWXNqOFpPRWp2a0FZYTZWVnV0ZGNVQ1A0V1FNaHdPVEMwP2U9cnJ5YTZQ&ga=1
The spreadsheet I manually created to collate the cost of various projects across the Anglosphere and compare them to cheaper jurisdictions: https://onedrive.live.com/:x:/g/personal/4581DB26FEC1B7AA/IQApQpAbby1PTrQSkBLo1IDuASba5Br8kLTQBWM95rPyT3o?resid=4581DB26FEC1B7AA%21s1b9042292d6f4e4fb4129012e8d480ee&ithint=file%2Cxlsx&e=3ei4aE&migratedtospo=true&redeem=aHR0cHM6Ly8xZHJ2Lm1zL3gvYy80NTgxZGIyNmZlYzFiN2FhL0lRQXBRcEFiYnkxUFRyUVNrQkxvMUlEdUFTYmE1QnI4a0xUUUJXTTk1clB5VDNvP2U9M2VpNGFF
Another much more in-depth spreadsheet by the Transit Costs Project - I got most of my data from here: https://onedrive.live.com/:x:/g/personal/4581DB26FEC1B7AA/IQCxJ8nrTdAiRqEHIIrRGLHDAXojE_ZxYEYp8GTOG2dRZ0g?resid=4581DB26FEC1B7AA%21sebc927b1d04d4622a107208ad118b1c3&ithint=file%2Cxlsx&e=6rLTNu&migratedtospo=true&redeem=aHR0cHM6Ly8xZHJ2Lm1zL3gvYy80NTgxZGIyNmZlYzFiN2FhL0lRQ3hKOG5yVGRBaVJxRUhJSXJSR0xIREFYb2pFX1p4WUVZcDhHVE9HMmRSWjBnP2U9NnJMVE51
I'm wondering if this is a common-law issue or poor insurance culture or corruption.
Notably Europe generally has a top notch insurance culture. And civil law + insurance might reduce lawsuits.
That said, look at Latvia and railbaltica. It's a shitshow, so maybe corruption.
I must get around to watching this video. I will say that I take exception to the thumbnail though: The Perth Metronet project finished up earlier this year, it costing $12.4 billion to roll out 72km of track.
On the surface, that comes out at about $172 million per kilometre. But, that is only part of the story. That money also paid for the construction/renovation of 18-23 stations, 8km of tunnels under the river for the new airport line, elevation of 5.5 km of track, removal of several level crossings, and a whole program to locally manufacture trains.
Just reducing the project to 'dollars per kilometre' would be super inaccurate for the overall result. But even then, that would be less than a quarter the implied cost of building a rail line in Australia from that thumbnail.
this was one project that seemed to be done well
it seems unique .... east coat rail thing is a complete and utter fuck up over costing by billions. just look at the now cancelled inland rail,
personally I think we just admit we're incompetent, and outsource the entire thing to Chinese companies. including where to build as we seem to fuck that up as well.
📺Insert Utopia video about trains and costs. 📺
While China has built an amazing cross country high speed rail and some of the cities metros are better than anything I've seen, their maintenance of these systems remains my fear. I guess the maintenance would be done locally and managed by local authorities so should be alright.
Signals from noise, cause and effect, my dog has four legs a tail and a long nose, a crocodile has four legs, a tail and a long nose, therefore my dog is a crocodile!
all 3 comments