Lately the Comments section under Perchance generators have turned into something disgusting, and it's troubling that no one seems to be doing anything about it. I've been seeing shit like CP requesting: , sharing "secret message" links: and possibly even CP sharing quite often. Looks like those chat rooms aren't moderated at all and are becoming a ground for criminal activity. I, and I'm sure many of us as well, would really despise it if law enforcement took the problem in their hands and took down the only free and limitless AI generation site. Comments need to be either moderated or shut down, otherwise this site is at risk. Perchance is all about AI, so you could at least install some AI filter to check messages in the chat if you can't do anything else.

Please, take action.

Edit: who the fuck is downvoting?

all 59 comments

sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] 6 points 3 months ago* (2 children)

Honestly? I kinda side with you, but not fully. As a father of 3 the topic of CP concerns me more than you can think. But the reality is, that they will never stop doing so. Also, putting on moderation will be the downfall of the perchance project imo, as it will prevent people from going for all kinds of their RPs that are not approved by society. Then, again, as a father, knowing that these people will never stop doing what they are doing, i prefer they share their AI generated shit, instead of harming real Children. Make of it whatever you want, but that's my 2 cent.

  • source
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] [S] 1 point 3 months ago* (last edited 3 months ago)

    I was not talking about AI generated images or any guardrails on AI. I was talking about real, actual CP networking, with actual children, and the moderation of Comments (that's what I called chatrooms) where real people talk, not chats with bots.

    I changed the title of the post for clarity.

    I also don't support any kind of guardrails for AI itself, except abuse material based on real people and instructions on harmful actions.

  • source
  • parent
  • [–] 2 points 3 months ago (27 children)

    People here tend to mass downvote posts for some reason, no matter what it is: Bug reporting, question asking, anything.

  • source
  • hideshow 27 child comments
  • [–] [S] 3 points 3 months ago (16 children)

    And yes, this place is really just a downvote circlejerk.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 16 child comments
  • [–] 1 point 3 months ago (15 children)

    This is why I unsubscribed from this and am moving from AI services. I swear, when I get all of my friends on perchance to move to Stoat, I'll leave that CP scumbag site forever.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 15 child comments
  • [+] [S] 1 point 3 months ago (13 children)
  • [–] 1 point 3 months ago (12 children)

    Trying to defend the dev and realizing you're wrong, eh?

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 12 child comments
  • [–] [S] 1 point 3 months ago* (11 children)

    Hahaha, no. My dumbass brain just got its hopes up that Stoat is an AI similar to Perchance, and wanted to ask, and then I just googled it and realized it's a Discord type thing.

    I'm as pissed at the dev as you are, and even more for endangering a site I value.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 11 child comments
  • [–] 1 point 3 months ago (10 children)

    Aaaah, okay, okay, sorry. Hammer AI is one, though.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 10 child comments
  • [–] [S] 1 point 3 months ago (9 children)

    Does it only have a chat? Does it have image gen? Does it have limitations? Or censorship?

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 9 child comments
  • [–] 1 point 3 months ago (8 children)

    It has both image and chat. Plus a story generator. It has limitations, yes, but it's, like, messages per minute only and for frre accounts. Censorship, not that I know yet.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 8 child comments
  • [–] [S] 1 point 3 months ago (7 children)
  • [–] 1 point 3 months ago (6 children)
  • [–] [S] 1 point 3 months ago (5 children)
  • [–] 1 point 3 months ago (4 children)

    There isn't a credits system. Max there is is a "messages per minute limit" for free accounts. But said limit isn't this abusive, it's big as enough so I didn't know about it until someone posted on it.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 4 child comments
  • [–] [S] 1 point 3 months ago* (3 children)

    Is your account paid?

    Have you tried to generate images? It doesn't let me, says I don't have enough credits.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 3 child comments
  • [–] 1 point 3 months ago (2 children)

    No, I have a free one, I don't have a job yet.

    Hmm, may be different for images. I never used the image function to be honest so... Maybe ask at the Hammer AI Reddit? (I'm still trying to convince them to have a Lemmy one but for now they're still on Reddit)

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • load more comments (-1 replies)
  • [–] [S] 2 points 3 months ago* (9 children)

    Not only posts, but every comment. Someone downvoted literally every comment in this thread.

    Now I really wonder who those people are to get so pissed about the call to stop CP distribution.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 9 child comments
  • [–] 3 points 3 months ago (8 children)

    Actually, I think it's some dev bootlicker. The dev doesn't do shit on the website except putting it down for changes nobody asked for, yet any reports about problems (it causes) on the website will get downvoted. Good job on opening the case, don't listen to those downvotes.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 8 child comments
  • [–] [S] 3 points 3 months ago* (7 children)

    Yep, some dev bootlicker defending their zero-fucks attitude just because they're a single person or whatever.

    Like come on, shutting comments down shouldn't be that much of a probem. When shit gets out of hand to this level, things need to be done. Regardless of how tired or busy you are.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 7 child comments
  • [–] 1 point 3 months ago (6 children)

    Finally, someone that thoughtful. I think the issue is some of us got friends in the comments section, so... The best would be giving it better moderation.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 6 child comments
  • [–] [S] 1 point 3 months ago* (5 children)

    Human moderation is really too much to ask for, AI moderation - I dunno. Considering the dev's indifference, best would probably be to get rid of it.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 5 child comments
  • [–] 1 point 3 months ago* (last edited 3 months ago) (4 children)

    According to one of thse CP senders themselves, the AI moderation (revealed by @saveperchance to be a mere word filter) in the website is really weak. For an example, you can circumvent it by typing CP instead of Child (I ain't typing the entire thing.).

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 4 child comments
  • [–] [S] 1 point 3 months ago* (3 children)

    That's not AI, it's just a basic word filter. That's never going to do shit cause you're always able to circumvent it by censoring or saying it in another way.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 3 child comments
  • [–] 1 point 3 months ago (2 children)

    Thanks for the correction. I'll edit my coment. And also, mass reports also can get someone banned. So you can just click report on every message someone sends and they will be banned in no time.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] 2 points 3 months ago*

    https://lemmy.world/post/49041435

    I whistleblew this too

    The following reports are matters both me, and others; have submitted regarding a single gen alone

    National Center for Missing & Exploited Children; cases regarding Child Sex Exploitation (CSE), Child Sexual Assault Material (CSAM), URLGF (Unconsensual Real Life Gore Footage), and RGR (Recorded Gang Rape):

    Case ID: 249451324 Case ID: 249451324 Case ID: 247759639 Case ID: 249540283 Case ID: 249542360 Case ID: 249542716 Case ID: 249543071 Case ID: 249542931 Case ID: 249544938 Master Case ID (Collective Act Against the Chatroom Generally): 247751090 Master Case ID (Primary Child Sexual Exploitation / Trafficking Report): 249570170

    Cloudfare submissions: Case ID: Case ID: laacur-20260708-N10

    Report submitted to the IWF: Original URL: https://www.iwf.org.uk/en/uk-report/thank-you/ CaseID: 83913N2ee2Â

    Canadian Cybertip case: Case ID: bt6vjb-20260712-N12.

    ^

  • source
  • [–] 1 point 3 months ago (15 children)

    Yeah, it concerns me on how the Chatrooms are unmoderated, like I know the creator is really busy and can’t moderate right now but gosh The chat room is getting worse and worse, cause yesterday i was using perchance As usual then out of curiosity i took a quick glance to the chat room but then I saw someone talking about really, really disgusting topic—I’m not going to say this here cause I’m afraid I might get banned…I just really hope the creator would take action.

  • source
  • hideshow 15 child comments
  • [+] 1 point 3 months ago (2 children)
  • [–] [S] 1 point 3 months ago* (1 child)

    Not every comment is deranged like that, most of it are normal people - well, not exactly normal 😅 - but nothing criminal, but from what I've seen and heard, it really is a significant problem.

    Let the criminals flood them, set up tracking, and let professionals investigate those links.

    Like all of us, you're suggesting ideas only for them to fall on completely deaf ears, the dev is not here or anywhere we can reach them. That's why all this shit started in the first place.

    If only the criminals are using the chatrooms, there wouldn’t be an issue with shutting them down.

    No, not only criminals, it's not like it's dark web or something. A lot of people chat normally, but yeah, if no one's gonna moderate it in whatever way, let it be gone for good. I bet most people wouldn't care, but if they do, apologies to them, but the risk is too high.

    Am I missing something?

    Yeah, the fact that the dev is either AWOL or doesn't give a damn.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 1 child comment
  • load more comments (-1 replies)
  • [–] [S] 0 points 3 months ago* (last edited 3 months ago) (12 children)

    Almost anything on the internet is moderated. Maybe because moderators get paid or profit from ads, or maybe because there's less to moderate. Idk why they can't moderate Perchance chatrooms, possibly because people are creating their own generators uncontrollably and each one has its own chat? In this case they should really install an AI filter.

    Like, a few months ago I didn't see anything of the sort there. People are getting bolder because they realize it's an unmoderated chaos, and it can even get worse if nothing is done about it and bring some undue attention.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 12 child comments
  • [–] 3 points 3 months ago (11 children)

    I heard that the creator was a single Individual, they handle All AI and controversial things and if you read the note near the Chatrooms or comment you will see that the Owner said they don’t have time to moderate

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 11 child comments
  • [–] [S] 0 points 3 months ago* (10 children)

    Holy fuck, of course it's impossible if all of it lies on single shoulders. It's really unfortunate that people can't be decent human beings and wherever rule enforcement is slack they exploit it. But it can't go on like this, so they have to choose one of the two options.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 10 child comments
  • [–] 0 points 3 months ago (9 children)

    Two options, yeah, a good example is when the creator or perchance.org is unknown or stays anonymous, yet they continue to dedicate to perchance, on the other hand there’s of course shitty people always talking about some disgusting topic but yeah sooner enough they get what they want, just not in the way they think.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 9 child comments
  • [–] [S] 0 points 3 months ago (8 children)
  • [–] 0 points 3 months ago (7 children)

    Example when a person get’s a high paying job, at first they feel good and energetic, sooner and sooner more pressure and stress comes in, slowly. They got their dream job but not in the pretty little fantasy they think

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 7 child comments
  • [–] [S] 0 points 3 months ago (6 children)

    Do you by any chance know where I can contact the creator directly, or at least as close to that as possible?

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 6 child comments
  • [–] 0 points 3 months ago (5 children)

    Why? Would you like to request something, report a bug, or have a private conversation? That would narrow it down for me to find a way to contant the dev.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 5 child comments
  • [–] [S] 0 points 3 months ago (4 children)
  • [–] 0 points 3 months ago (3 children)

    Hm, sadly No, there is no public direct email, phone number, or immediate contact form to reach the owner of Perchance.org. The platform is run anonymously, and its listed administrative email address (admin@perchance.org) is widely known by the community to be inactive or unresponsive, but tell me, where comment you saw in Chatrooms? Is it an official AI generator or something else?

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 3 child comments
  • [–] [S] 0 points 3 months ago (2 children)
  • [–] 1 point 3 months ago (1 child)

    Okay so follow my steps—Submit the details directly on the community-run Perchance Report a User Page (https://perchance.org/report-a-user). Copy and paste the specific page layout URL (https://perchance.org/image-generator-professional) and provide the user's nickname or details along with your reason, or through here Lemmy Platform or perchance’s reddit (https://www.reddit.com/r/perchance/) and you can block those shitty people by clicking the Gear Icon inside the chat, type user to fetch the bitch’s specific ID, and block or flag them

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 1 child comment
  • load more comments (-1 replies)
    [+] -1 points 3 months ago (5 children)
  • [–] 1 point 3 months ago* (last edited 3 months ago) (2 children)

    CSAM is criminal, no doubt. No justification exists for its creation or distribution. I would, however, point out that there are opportunities available to flag such material, or users promoting or seeking it, including the generator with comments that allow it. I’ve used some of the uncensored generators, but never comment if the option is available, because I don’t want to be involved with how others use the generator, even if only by being swept up in the inevitable investigation.

    This problem is as old as the internet, and will always exist. AI actually makes it infinitely easier to bypass moderation and censorship! It seems to me that people who are trying to shut down sites like Perchance, which are not intended as venues for any kind of criminal activity, but rather are available for freedom of creation and expression, need to find something better to do with their time. If fighting CSAM is their life purpose, good on 'em! But they’re time and resources would definitely be better spent, and more effective, focused on legitimate targets, like those who actually produce CSAM, prey on children directly (the fact that minors can see or access adult content is another issue entirely!), and deliberately facilitate any component of that behavior.

    Quite well put! Though, what I’ve been currently advocating, is the removal of a comment section on a specific generator that’s notorious for csam distribution

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [+] 0 points 3 months ago (2 children)
  • [–] 2 points 3 months ago*

    I’m yet to understand how doing my basic civic duty, in reporting all the CSAM I’ve come across in light of obvious administrative negligence; is crusading

    And again, just because there are larger platforms that have the material, does not necessarily remove the risk at hand

  • source
  • parent
  • [–] [S] 1 point 3 months ago* (last edited 3 months ago)

    Because this kind of shit running freely there puts the site at risk (let alone the obvious argument that it shouldn't be distributed anywhere, and we should do what we can to stop it). Isn't it clear.

    And yes, if no one's gonna moderate the comments, they should be removed. Is it also not obvious that the lack of proper moderation attracts bad apples, and bad apples can bring trouble upon a site that does next to nothing to counter it?

  • source
  • parent
  • load more comments (-1 replies)
  • [–] [S] 1 point 3 months ago* (last edited 3 months ago) (1 child)

    First of all, how did you even manage to conflate "free and limitless AI generator" with a "no-limit user chat"?... Secondly... Can't you see how you're contradicting yourself? You agree with my concern about Perchance being in danger, yet you argue against preventing the very thing that endangers it. I'm not arguing for any censorship at all except against CP networking and other illegal shit. And given the indifference/absence of the dev, don't you think the best option is removing the comment section entirely?

    The flagging does a shit job, aka nothing, to prevent it. Even if you get banned, you can easily circumvent it by changing your IP, and the fact that nothing prevents those messages from being sent in the first place is a problem. So you can do whatever you want until you get banned, and then switch your IP and continue. Is that moderation?

    CP distribution and possession is illegal, and if a site facilitates it, even by negligence, it eventually attracts legal attention. Obviously, the priority should be CP producers and active pedophiles, but it doesn't mean we should do nothing to its consumers.

    Perchance warns you several times that you should only use a NSFW generator or view NSFW images in the gallery if you're 18+. If a minor actively chooses to access adult content, that's on them. What, do you want an ID age verification? Be fr.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 1 child comment
  • [+] 2 points 3 months ago (1 child)
  • [–] [S] 2 points 3 months ago* (last edited 3 months ago)

    If there was moderation filtering out those creeps in the first place, that wouldn't be needed.

    If I was making a generator, I would just disable the comment section entirely, or write some (sadly, fake, as we can't actually implement it) message that there's a strict AI moderation that sends your whole data to the cops if you write something like this, lol.

    I can think of some other ideas - such as trying to implement an extensive word/link text filter.

    And did you change Comments to Feedback and disable other users except yourself from seeing it? If yes, nice move.

  • source
  • parent
  • load more comments (-1 replies)