all 3 comments

sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] 2 points 3 months ago (2 children)

The New York Times is not a credible source.

  • source
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • 3 comments in c/nyt_gift_articles@sopuli.xyz view that post
    [–] 1 point 3 months ago

    its well known AI ones are pretty easy to detect, even copy and pasted from someone who written is very noticble(even if you changed a little)

  • source
  • [–] 2 points 3 months ago (1 child)

    Interesting thing happened to me this week. I had to write something. i wrote it entirely myself, though I did use AI to format it because I'm lazy, but the actual writing was me.

    I gave it to a friend to proofread and he told me that it looked like it was written by AI. I asked the formatting, and he said, no the text, wording and punctuation. So I put it into AI, told it to rewrite it, and it changed the wording and phrasing for most of it, but the core concepts were still mine.

    I sent it back to him and friend told me that it was better and now looks written by a human.

    I don't even know what to say to that.

  • source
  • hideshow 1 child comment