▲ 200 ▼ For all the truckers out there. (sh.itjust.works) submitted 1 year ago by hondaguy97386@sh.itjust.works to c/atheistmemes@lemmy.world 12 comments fedilink hide all child comments
[–] db2@lemmy.world 10 points 1 year ago (10 children) Who is this supposed to be insulting to, the scale master, the wife or the driver? permalink fedilink source hideshow 10 child comments replies: [–] Khanzarate@lemmy.world 14 points 1 year ago (6 children) They're calling the scale master's wife fat, so I'd say the scale master, assuming they're making it up. If the scale master's wife really is in the sleeper then they're making fun of her. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 6 child comments replies: [–] db2@lemmy.world 3 points 1 year ago (5 children) And yet one married her and the other wants to screw her, but it's also somehow an insult? It's illogical nonsense. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 5 child comments replies: [–] Khanzarate@lemmy.world 9 points 1 year ago (3 children) Well of course it's not logical it's a joke. Don't forget, Jesus is telling him to say that. Logic is just not how this is meant to be interpreted. This isn't debate club. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 3 child comments replies: [+] db2@lemmy.world -8 points 1 year ago (2 children) ... then why did you respond? permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] Khanzarate@lemmy.world 8 points 1 year ago (1 child) Well usually I find people like answers to their questions, and am generally happy to help when I have those answers. It can also be interesting to run through the hypothetical scenario this sort of response would suggest. However, just because we can and did put the scenario in a framework of logic and see what that gave us, that doesn't mean the original scenario is meant for it. Calling it illogical nonsense when it was never meant to be a genuine scenario is like calling a fish a horrible distance runner. You're not wrong, but you're missing the entire point. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 1 child comment replies: [–] RedditRefugee69@lemmynsfw.com 1 point 1 year ago First of all, how dare you. permalink fedilink source parent [–] lars@lemmy.sdf.org 3 points 1 year ago When hot men think I’m debasing myself to let them fuck me, I try to not overthink that part. permalink fedilink source parent [–] IndiBrony@lemmy.world 12 points 1 year ago (1 child) Yes. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 1 child comment replies: [–] db2@lemmy.world 2 points 1 year ago It's literally the only way it even makes any sense. permalink fedilink source parent [–] 21Cabbage@lemmynsfw.com 11 points 1 year ago I think it's just general fighting words to throw out there. permalink fedilink source parent
[–] Khanzarate@lemmy.world 14 points 1 year ago (6 children) They're calling the scale master's wife fat, so I'd say the scale master, assuming they're making it up. If the scale master's wife really is in the sleeper then they're making fun of her. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 6 child comments replies: [–] db2@lemmy.world 3 points 1 year ago (5 children) And yet one married her and the other wants to screw her, but it's also somehow an insult? It's illogical nonsense. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 5 child comments replies: [–] Khanzarate@lemmy.world 9 points 1 year ago (3 children) Well of course it's not logical it's a joke. Don't forget, Jesus is telling him to say that. Logic is just not how this is meant to be interpreted. This isn't debate club. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 3 child comments replies: [+] db2@lemmy.world -8 points 1 year ago (2 children) ... then why did you respond? permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] Khanzarate@lemmy.world 8 points 1 year ago (1 child) Well usually I find people like answers to their questions, and am generally happy to help when I have those answers. It can also be interesting to run through the hypothetical scenario this sort of response would suggest. However, just because we can and did put the scenario in a framework of logic and see what that gave us, that doesn't mean the original scenario is meant for it. Calling it illogical nonsense when it was never meant to be a genuine scenario is like calling a fish a horrible distance runner. You're not wrong, but you're missing the entire point. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 1 child comment replies: [–] RedditRefugee69@lemmynsfw.com 1 point 1 year ago First of all, how dare you. permalink fedilink source parent [–] lars@lemmy.sdf.org 3 points 1 year ago When hot men think I’m debasing myself to let them fuck me, I try to not overthink that part. permalink fedilink source parent
[–] db2@lemmy.world 3 points 1 year ago (5 children) And yet one married her and the other wants to screw her, but it's also somehow an insult? It's illogical nonsense. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 5 child comments replies: [–] Khanzarate@lemmy.world 9 points 1 year ago (3 children) Well of course it's not logical it's a joke. Don't forget, Jesus is telling him to say that. Logic is just not how this is meant to be interpreted. This isn't debate club. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 3 child comments replies: [+] db2@lemmy.world -8 points 1 year ago (2 children) ... then why did you respond? permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] Khanzarate@lemmy.world 8 points 1 year ago (1 child) Well usually I find people like answers to their questions, and am generally happy to help when I have those answers. It can also be interesting to run through the hypothetical scenario this sort of response would suggest. However, just because we can and did put the scenario in a framework of logic and see what that gave us, that doesn't mean the original scenario is meant for it. Calling it illogical nonsense when it was never meant to be a genuine scenario is like calling a fish a horrible distance runner. You're not wrong, but you're missing the entire point. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 1 child comment replies: [–] RedditRefugee69@lemmynsfw.com 1 point 1 year ago First of all, how dare you. permalink fedilink source parent [–] lars@lemmy.sdf.org 3 points 1 year ago When hot men think I’m debasing myself to let them fuck me, I try to not overthink that part. permalink fedilink source parent
[–] Khanzarate@lemmy.world 9 points 1 year ago (3 children) Well of course it's not logical it's a joke. Don't forget, Jesus is telling him to say that. Logic is just not how this is meant to be interpreted. This isn't debate club. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 3 child comments replies: [+] db2@lemmy.world -8 points 1 year ago (2 children) ... then why did you respond? permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] Khanzarate@lemmy.world 8 points 1 year ago (1 child) Well usually I find people like answers to their questions, and am generally happy to help when I have those answers. It can also be interesting to run through the hypothetical scenario this sort of response would suggest. However, just because we can and did put the scenario in a framework of logic and see what that gave us, that doesn't mean the original scenario is meant for it. Calling it illogical nonsense when it was never meant to be a genuine scenario is like calling a fish a horrible distance runner. You're not wrong, but you're missing the entire point. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 1 child comment replies: [–] RedditRefugee69@lemmynsfw.com 1 point 1 year ago First of all, how dare you. permalink fedilink source parent
[+] db2@lemmy.world -8 points 1 year ago (2 children) ... then why did you respond? permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] Khanzarate@lemmy.world 8 points 1 year ago (1 child) Well usually I find people like answers to their questions, and am generally happy to help when I have those answers. It can also be interesting to run through the hypothetical scenario this sort of response would suggest. However, just because we can and did put the scenario in a framework of logic and see what that gave us, that doesn't mean the original scenario is meant for it. Calling it illogical nonsense when it was never meant to be a genuine scenario is like calling a fish a horrible distance runner. You're not wrong, but you're missing the entire point. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 1 child comment replies: [–] RedditRefugee69@lemmynsfw.com 1 point 1 year ago First of all, how dare you. permalink fedilink source parent
[–] Khanzarate@lemmy.world 8 points 1 year ago (1 child) Well usually I find people like answers to their questions, and am generally happy to help when I have those answers. It can also be interesting to run through the hypothetical scenario this sort of response would suggest. However, just because we can and did put the scenario in a framework of logic and see what that gave us, that doesn't mean the original scenario is meant for it. Calling it illogical nonsense when it was never meant to be a genuine scenario is like calling a fish a horrible distance runner. You're not wrong, but you're missing the entire point. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 1 child comment replies: [–] RedditRefugee69@lemmynsfw.com 1 point 1 year ago First of all, how dare you. permalink fedilink source parent
[–] RedditRefugee69@lemmynsfw.com 1 point 1 year ago First of all, how dare you. permalink fedilink source parent
[–] lars@lemmy.sdf.org 3 points 1 year ago When hot men think I’m debasing myself to let them fuck me, I try to not overthink that part. permalink fedilink source parent
[–] IndiBrony@lemmy.world 12 points 1 year ago (1 child) Yes. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 1 child comment replies: [–] db2@lemmy.world 2 points 1 year ago It's literally the only way it even makes any sense. permalink fedilink source parent
[–] db2@lemmy.world 2 points 1 year ago It's literally the only way it even makes any sense. permalink fedilink source parent
[–] 21Cabbage@lemmynsfw.com 11 points 1 year ago I think it's just general fighting words to throw out there. permalink fedilink source parent
all 12 comments