all 5 comments

sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] 10 points 4 months ago (2 children)

In article it says the probrem was staff resignations, not AI. They brought them back with more money to set up the AI systems.

  • source
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] 1 point 4 months ago

    Whether they laid people off or chose not fill vacancies with experience, the net result is still the same. They replaced people with AI, expecting known imprecise tools to do precise work, and it was really fucking stupid.

  • source
  • parent
  • [–] 2 points 4 months ago*

    Love seeing decisions like this blow up in corporate execs' faces.

    Also, sidebar, did my YT video on this topic this week if anyone's bored.

  • source
  • [–] 1 point 4 months ago

    Confusingly written article

  • source
  • 2 comments in c/artificial_intel@lemmy.ml view that post
    [–] 3 points 4 months ago

    If you thought imagined the automaker’s leadership would have turned against AI over the whole episode, think again — per The Verge, it’s added more than 100,000 new AI-powered tests to identify edge cases and stress software systems.

    And nothing of value was learned.

  • source
  • 1 comment in c/Aii@programming.dev view that post
    [–] 1 point 4 months ago

    Expensive lesson, honestly.

  • source