Well that's one way to to scare away the minority of users you still have on your platform...
post
It has no effect on rankings it literally just shows a tag to the user. If a customers response to the presence of that tag is not to buy the product, doesn't that represent some sort of cultural problem that should concern a CEO, rather than complaining about the presence of the feature?
I would argue for a "Publishers are arseholes" tag, along with other ones like "Studio got closed", "fired most of the developers"
No no, you don't get it. Consumers are fine with medium doses of AI, we just have to cover it up and don't tell them.
This is important because then as a CEO I get to keep my cake and eat it too - I don't have to pay workers to make games, and still charge for them as if I had actual costs.
This moronic valve policy is gonna kill our golden egg chicken!
Perspective above brought to you by the average asshole CEO.
Tim Sweeney is a cunt.
The More You Know
So EPIC brand = AI tag, got it.
I don't like Epic Games view on AI, while I agree AI is a tool I feel like for the most part it's pretty unethical (especially when it's trained on everything)
i hate steam as much as the next drm-hater but this is... actually... surprisingly responsible
Valve could probably do a lot more to protect gamers but also they are actually very good about requiring disclosures that they absolutely don't have to have, like third party accounts, Denuvo, EULA, kernel anti-cheat, etc.
I agree with you on DRM, but it is worth noting that Value is a rare case where despite having a dominant market position, they continue to offer and improve the best client experience.
Not without missteps of course, but there are nowhere near as bad as Microsoft, Google, Apple, etc.
If Tim Sweeny told me the sky was blue, I would, At the very least, double check.
all 23 comments