▲ 35 ▼ Mullvad: Reminder that OpenVPN is being removed January 15th 2026 (mullvad.net) submitted 1 year ago by cm0002@piefed.world to c/privacy@programming.dev 12 comments fedilink hide all child comments
[–] Turret3857@infosec.pub 3 points 1 year ago* (last edited 2 days ago) (1 child) . permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 1 child comment replies: [–] Scoopta@programming.dev 3 points 1 year ago The big thing for public VPNs is the server can push the configuration to the client rather than having it be static. Config push, specifically for addressing is basically the only viable way to do a NATless VPN. Additionally while unrelated to public VPN providers wg does not have the ability to bind to individual IPs which is a headache for my internal VPN use case. permalink fedilink source parent
[–] Scoopta@programming.dev 3 points 1 year ago The big thing for public VPNs is the server can push the configuration to the client rather than having it be static. Config push, specifically for addressing is basically the only viable way to do a NATless VPN. Additionally while unrelated to public VPN providers wg does not have the ability to bind to individual IPs which is a headache for my internal VPN use case. permalink fedilink source parent