you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] 2 points 1 year ago* (5 children)

that's why i linked the article! the bulk of it is about limes. they did animal testing in the 1920s (before the discovery of vitamin C) and found that

  1. lime juice is about 25% as effective as lemon juice at preventing scurvy, when fresh, and
  2. its efficacy was reduced by being in contact with a) air and b) copper, which means the open-face copper tanks used to store the stuff at sea was... not well thought out.

basically, as it was used by the british navy it was completely useless.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 5 child comments
  • [–] 2 points 1 year ago (4 children)

    Right. The problem is not that they used limes, it's that they did a bunch of stuff to neuter the effectiveness of the limes.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 4 child comments
  • [–] 2 points 1 year ago (3 children)

    well i mean the fact that they used limes were also part of the problem, since lemon juice could actually handle those conditions. so everything else being equal they would have seen increased rates of scurvy, but the steam age saved them.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 3 child comments
  • [–] 2 points 1 year ago (2 children)

    Could it handle those conditions? I was under the impression that all vitamin C degrades with exposure to heat, light, and air. I'm not seeing anything that suggests lemon juice is immune.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] 1 point 1 year ago (1 child)

    as i read it it wasn't immune, it just took longer.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 1 child comment