That’s not what I’m saying. They’ve all but outright said they’re unprofitable.

But revenue is increasing. Now, if it stops increasing like they’ve “leveled out”, that is a problem.

Hence it’s a stretch to assume they would decrease costs for a more expensive model since that would basically pop their bubble well before 2029.

There's a difference between selling at a loss, and having a loss.

OpenAI let's people use models for free with very little limits other than reducing the model quality over time, and they have very generous limits before they limit you at that.

That all costs money and is a loss for them.

If they get someone who's willing to pay, and they charge $20/m and on average, they net $5 profit per customer, they aren't selling it at a loss, they just need more customers. It's possible that a paid customer uses it even more though and it actually does incur a loss per paid customer and they're doing that to try and gain users while they figure out how to lower their costs, but that seems less likely.

Okay, make it sound worse and even more unprofitable.

Making their AI models cheaper to run (such as by requiring less electricity) is one step along that path to profitability.