843
lads (lemmy.world)
submitted 1 year ago by to c/programmer_humor@programming.dev
57 comments fedilink hide all child comments
 
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] 0 points 1 year ago* (5 children)

I'm not saying it's not open source or free. I say that it does not contribute to make the web free and open. It really only contribute into making everyone waste more energy surfing the web.

The web is already too heavy we do NOT need PoW added to that.

I don't think even a raspberry 2 would go down over a web scrap. And Anubis cannot protect from proper ddos so...

  • permalink
  • fedilink
  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 5 child comments
    •
  • [–] 6 points 1 year ago (4 children)

    I don’t think even a raspberry 2 would go down over a web scrap

    Absolutely depends on what software the server is running, if there’s proper caching involved. If running some PoW is involved to scrape 1 page it shouldn’t be too much of an issue, as opposed to just blindly following and ingesting every link.

    Additionally, you can choose “good bots” like the internet archive, and they’re currently working on a list of “good bots”

    https://github.com/TecharoHQ/anubis/blob/main/docs/docs/admin/policies.mdx

    AI companies ingesting data nonstop to train their models doesn’t make for a open and free internet, and will likely lead to the opposite, where users no longer even browse the web but trust in AI responses that maybe be hallucinated.

  • permalink
  • fedilink
  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 4 child comments
    •
  • [–] -4 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (3 children)

    There a small number of AI companies training full LLM models. And they usually do a few trains per years. What most people see as "AI bots" are not actually that.

    The influence of AI over the net is another topic. But anubis is also not doing anything about that as it just makes so the AI bots waste more energy getting the data or at most that data under "anubis protection" does not enter the training dataset. The AI will still be there.

    Am I in the list of "good bots" ?sometimes I scrap websites for price tracking or change tracking. If I see a website running malware on my end I would most likely just block that site, one legitimate user less.

  • permalink
  • fedilink
  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 3 child comments
    •
  • [–] 4 points 1 year ago (1 child)

    I (and A LOT) of lemmings already had enough of AI. We DON'T need AI-everything. So we block/make it harder for ai to be trained. We didn't say "hey, please train your llm on our data" anyways.

  • permalink
  • fedilink
  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 1 child comment
    •
  • [–] 0 points 1 year ago*

    That's legitimate.

    But it's not "open", nor "free".

    Also it's a little placebo. For instance Lemmy is not an Anubis usecase. As lemmy can be legitimately scrapped by any agent through the federation system. And I don't really know how would even Anubis work with the openess of the Lemmy API.

  • permalink
  • fedilink
  • source
  • parent
  • [–] 3 points 1 year ago

    That's outdated info. Yes, not a lot of scraping is really necessary for training. But LLMs are currently often coupled with web search to improve results.

    So for example if you ask ChatGPT to find a specific product for you, the result doesn't come from the model. Instead it does a web seach, then it loads the results, summarizes them and returns you the summary plus the links. This is a time-critical operation since the user is waiting for the results. It's also a bad operation for the site being scraped in many situations (mostly when looking for info, not for products) since the user might be satisfied with the summary and won't click the source.

    So if you can delay scraping like that by a few seconds, that's quite significant.

  • permalink
  • fedilink
  • source
  • parent