▲ -21 ▼ "Live long enough to become the villain" (lemmy.ml) submitted 1 year ago by bubblybubbles@lemmy.ml to c/memes@lemmy.ml 22 comments fedilink hide all child comments Or more lik live long enough to let your true villain colors show ha!
[–] Bassman27@lemmy.world 0 points 1 year ago (16 children) Why NATO? permalink fedilink source hideshow 16 child comments replies: [+] Cowbee@lemmy.ml 13 points 1 year ago (3 children) [removed by mod] permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 3 child comments replies: [–] Maeve@kbin.earth 6 points 1 year ago Amen. permalink fedilink source parent [–] Bassman27@lemmy.world -3 points 1 year ago (1 child) Oh much like china and Russia financially dominate Africa?? I understand now thank you permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 1 child comment load more comments (1 reply) [–] bubblybubbles@lemmy.ml [S] 2 points 1 year ago (10 children) NATO is nothing but a hostile organization to push western imperialism permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 10 child comments replies: [–] Bassman27@lemmy.world -3 points 1 year ago (1 child) Cringe permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 1 child comment replies: [–] bubblybubbles@lemmy.ml [S] 0 points 1 year ago .world lib user 🪞 permalink fedilink source parent [–] Alexstarfire@lemmy.world -2 points 1 year ago (5 children) I'm gonna need more than your word to believe that. Cause I'm not exactly going to believe the same thing Putin spouts as he attacks another neighboring country for their resources. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 5 child comments replies: [–] bubblybubbles@lemmy.ml [S] -2 points 1 year ago (4 children) https://www.workers.org/2024/06/79046/ permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 4 child comments replies: [–] Alexstarfire@lemmy.world -1 points 1 year ago (3 children) Provoked the war in Ukraine? Yea.... OK. That source became pretty uncredible with that line. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 3 child comments replies: [+] Cowbee@lemmy.ml 5 points 1 year ago (3 children) [removed by mod] permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 3 child comments replies: [–] Alexstarfire@lemmy.world -3 points 1 year ago (2 children) Perhaps Russia could have not attacked? Nah, too complicated. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [+] Cowbee@lemmy.ml 6 points 1 year ago (2 children) [removed by mod] permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] Alexstarfire@lemmy.world -3 points 1 year ago (1 child) I feel like I've been pretty clear on this. Russia is the aggressor and wants Ukraine's stuff. Russia just needed to not attack. This is obvious because every deal Russia's talked about includes taking/keeping Ukrainian land they occupy. I'm more curious why you think Russia is justified in their actions. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 1 child comment replies: [+] Cowbee@lemmy.ml 4 points 1 year ago* (1 child) [removed by mod] permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 1 child comment replies: [–] Alexstarfire@lemmy.world -2 points 1 year ago Uncritically? I think you need to read between the lines of what aggressors say. And this is true about the US too. At best they give you half truths and excuses. I suppose you believe Iraq had WMDs too? After all, that's what the US said. You can't tell me Russia doesn't want parts of Ukraine, then in the same post say that a chunk of Ukraine wants to be invaded (i.e. join Russia), when Russia has also stated that as one of the reasons for invading. Even if they want to join Russia, that doesn't give Russia the right to invade to "liberate" them. I'm not a historical expert on any of this. I just know what is reported in the media, which is not going to be the entire history. They aren't a history class. permalink fedilink source parent load more comments (-1 replies) load more comments (-1 replies) load more comments (-1 replies) [–] Semi_Hemi_Demigod@lemmy.world -5 points 1 year ago Yeah we only like Eastern imperialism! permalink fedilink source parent load more comments (1 reply) [–] Semi_Hemi_Demigod@lemmy.world -1 points 1 year ago Because OP loves Putin. permalink fedilink source parent [–] mannycalavera@feddit.uk -3 points 1 year ago Because OP is a 14 year old troll 🧌. permalink fedilink source parent load more comments (-1 replies)
[+] Cowbee@lemmy.ml 13 points 1 year ago (3 children) [removed by mod] permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 3 child comments replies: [–] Maeve@kbin.earth 6 points 1 year ago Amen. permalink fedilink source parent [–] Bassman27@lemmy.world -3 points 1 year ago (1 child) Oh much like china and Russia financially dominate Africa?? I understand now thank you permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 1 child comment load more comments (1 reply)
[–] Bassman27@lemmy.world -3 points 1 year ago (1 child) Oh much like china and Russia financially dominate Africa?? I understand now thank you permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 1 child comment load more comments (1 reply)
[–] bubblybubbles@lemmy.ml [S] 2 points 1 year ago (10 children) NATO is nothing but a hostile organization to push western imperialism permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 10 child comments replies: [–] Bassman27@lemmy.world -3 points 1 year ago (1 child) Cringe permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 1 child comment replies: [–] bubblybubbles@lemmy.ml [S] 0 points 1 year ago .world lib user 🪞 permalink fedilink source parent [–] Alexstarfire@lemmy.world -2 points 1 year ago (5 children) I'm gonna need more than your word to believe that. Cause I'm not exactly going to believe the same thing Putin spouts as he attacks another neighboring country for their resources. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 5 child comments replies: [–] bubblybubbles@lemmy.ml [S] -2 points 1 year ago (4 children) https://www.workers.org/2024/06/79046/ permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 4 child comments replies: [–] Alexstarfire@lemmy.world -1 points 1 year ago (3 children) Provoked the war in Ukraine? Yea.... OK. That source became pretty uncredible with that line. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 3 child comments replies: [+] Cowbee@lemmy.ml 5 points 1 year ago (3 children) [removed by mod] permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 3 child comments replies: [–] Alexstarfire@lemmy.world -3 points 1 year ago (2 children) Perhaps Russia could have not attacked? Nah, too complicated. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [+] Cowbee@lemmy.ml 6 points 1 year ago (2 children) [removed by mod] permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] Alexstarfire@lemmy.world -3 points 1 year ago (1 child) I feel like I've been pretty clear on this. Russia is the aggressor and wants Ukraine's stuff. Russia just needed to not attack. This is obvious because every deal Russia's talked about includes taking/keeping Ukrainian land they occupy. I'm more curious why you think Russia is justified in their actions. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 1 child comment replies: [+] Cowbee@lemmy.ml 4 points 1 year ago* (1 child) [removed by mod] permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 1 child comment replies: [–] Alexstarfire@lemmy.world -2 points 1 year ago Uncritically? I think you need to read between the lines of what aggressors say. And this is true about the US too. At best they give you half truths and excuses. I suppose you believe Iraq had WMDs too? After all, that's what the US said. You can't tell me Russia doesn't want parts of Ukraine, then in the same post say that a chunk of Ukraine wants to be invaded (i.e. join Russia), when Russia has also stated that as one of the reasons for invading. Even if they want to join Russia, that doesn't give Russia the right to invade to "liberate" them. I'm not a historical expert on any of this. I just know what is reported in the media, which is not going to be the entire history. They aren't a history class. permalink fedilink source parent load more comments (-1 replies) load more comments (-1 replies) load more comments (-1 replies) [–] Semi_Hemi_Demigod@lemmy.world -5 points 1 year ago Yeah we only like Eastern imperialism! permalink fedilink source parent load more comments (1 reply)
[–] Bassman27@lemmy.world -3 points 1 year ago (1 child) Cringe permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 1 child comment replies: [–] bubblybubbles@lemmy.ml [S] 0 points 1 year ago .world lib user 🪞 permalink fedilink source parent
[–] bubblybubbles@lemmy.ml [S] 0 points 1 year ago .world lib user 🪞 permalink fedilink source parent
[–] Alexstarfire@lemmy.world -2 points 1 year ago (5 children) I'm gonna need more than your word to believe that. Cause I'm not exactly going to believe the same thing Putin spouts as he attacks another neighboring country for their resources. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 5 child comments replies: [–] bubblybubbles@lemmy.ml [S] -2 points 1 year ago (4 children) https://www.workers.org/2024/06/79046/ permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 4 child comments replies: [–] Alexstarfire@lemmy.world -1 points 1 year ago (3 children) Provoked the war in Ukraine? Yea.... OK. That source became pretty uncredible with that line. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 3 child comments replies: [+] Cowbee@lemmy.ml 5 points 1 year ago (3 children) [removed by mod] permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 3 child comments replies: [–] Alexstarfire@lemmy.world -3 points 1 year ago (2 children) Perhaps Russia could have not attacked? Nah, too complicated. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [+] Cowbee@lemmy.ml 6 points 1 year ago (2 children) [removed by mod] permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] Alexstarfire@lemmy.world -3 points 1 year ago (1 child) I feel like I've been pretty clear on this. Russia is the aggressor and wants Ukraine's stuff. Russia just needed to not attack. This is obvious because every deal Russia's talked about includes taking/keeping Ukrainian land they occupy. I'm more curious why you think Russia is justified in their actions. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 1 child comment replies: [+] Cowbee@lemmy.ml 4 points 1 year ago* (1 child) [removed by mod] permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 1 child comment replies: [–] Alexstarfire@lemmy.world -2 points 1 year ago Uncritically? I think you need to read between the lines of what aggressors say. And this is true about the US too. At best they give you half truths and excuses. I suppose you believe Iraq had WMDs too? After all, that's what the US said. You can't tell me Russia doesn't want parts of Ukraine, then in the same post say that a chunk of Ukraine wants to be invaded (i.e. join Russia), when Russia has also stated that as one of the reasons for invading. Even if they want to join Russia, that doesn't give Russia the right to invade to "liberate" them. I'm not a historical expert on any of this. I just know what is reported in the media, which is not going to be the entire history. They aren't a history class. permalink fedilink source parent load more comments (-1 replies) load more comments (-1 replies) load more comments (-1 replies)
[–] bubblybubbles@lemmy.ml [S] -2 points 1 year ago (4 children) https://www.workers.org/2024/06/79046/ permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 4 child comments replies: [–] Alexstarfire@lemmy.world -1 points 1 year ago (3 children) Provoked the war in Ukraine? Yea.... OK. That source became pretty uncredible with that line. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 3 child comments replies: [+] Cowbee@lemmy.ml 5 points 1 year ago (3 children) [removed by mod] permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 3 child comments replies: [–] Alexstarfire@lemmy.world -3 points 1 year ago (2 children) Perhaps Russia could have not attacked? Nah, too complicated. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [+] Cowbee@lemmy.ml 6 points 1 year ago (2 children) [removed by mod] permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] Alexstarfire@lemmy.world -3 points 1 year ago (1 child) I feel like I've been pretty clear on this. Russia is the aggressor and wants Ukraine's stuff. Russia just needed to not attack. This is obvious because every deal Russia's talked about includes taking/keeping Ukrainian land they occupy. I'm more curious why you think Russia is justified in their actions. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 1 child comment replies: [+] Cowbee@lemmy.ml 4 points 1 year ago* (1 child) [removed by mod] permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 1 child comment replies: [–] Alexstarfire@lemmy.world -2 points 1 year ago Uncritically? I think you need to read between the lines of what aggressors say. And this is true about the US too. At best they give you half truths and excuses. I suppose you believe Iraq had WMDs too? After all, that's what the US said. You can't tell me Russia doesn't want parts of Ukraine, then in the same post say that a chunk of Ukraine wants to be invaded (i.e. join Russia), when Russia has also stated that as one of the reasons for invading. Even if they want to join Russia, that doesn't give Russia the right to invade to "liberate" them. I'm not a historical expert on any of this. I just know what is reported in the media, which is not going to be the entire history. They aren't a history class. permalink fedilink source parent load more comments (-1 replies) load more comments (-1 replies) load more comments (-1 replies)
[–] Alexstarfire@lemmy.world -1 points 1 year ago (3 children) Provoked the war in Ukraine? Yea.... OK. That source became pretty uncredible with that line. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 3 child comments replies: [+] Cowbee@lemmy.ml 5 points 1 year ago (3 children) [removed by mod] permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 3 child comments replies: [–] Alexstarfire@lemmy.world -3 points 1 year ago (2 children) Perhaps Russia could have not attacked? Nah, too complicated. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [+] Cowbee@lemmy.ml 6 points 1 year ago (2 children) [removed by mod] permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] Alexstarfire@lemmy.world -3 points 1 year ago (1 child) I feel like I've been pretty clear on this. Russia is the aggressor and wants Ukraine's stuff. Russia just needed to not attack. This is obvious because every deal Russia's talked about includes taking/keeping Ukrainian land they occupy. I'm more curious why you think Russia is justified in their actions. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 1 child comment replies: [+] Cowbee@lemmy.ml 4 points 1 year ago* (1 child) [removed by mod] permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 1 child comment replies: [–] Alexstarfire@lemmy.world -2 points 1 year ago Uncritically? I think you need to read between the lines of what aggressors say. And this is true about the US too. At best they give you half truths and excuses. I suppose you believe Iraq had WMDs too? After all, that's what the US said. You can't tell me Russia doesn't want parts of Ukraine, then in the same post say that a chunk of Ukraine wants to be invaded (i.e. join Russia), when Russia has also stated that as one of the reasons for invading. Even if they want to join Russia, that doesn't give Russia the right to invade to "liberate" them. I'm not a historical expert on any of this. I just know what is reported in the media, which is not going to be the entire history. They aren't a history class. permalink fedilink source parent load more comments (-1 replies) load more comments (-1 replies) load more comments (-1 replies)
[+] Cowbee@lemmy.ml 5 points 1 year ago (3 children) [removed by mod] permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 3 child comments replies: [–] Alexstarfire@lemmy.world -3 points 1 year ago (2 children) Perhaps Russia could have not attacked? Nah, too complicated. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [+] Cowbee@lemmy.ml 6 points 1 year ago (2 children) [removed by mod] permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] Alexstarfire@lemmy.world -3 points 1 year ago (1 child) I feel like I've been pretty clear on this. Russia is the aggressor and wants Ukraine's stuff. Russia just needed to not attack. This is obvious because every deal Russia's talked about includes taking/keeping Ukrainian land they occupy. I'm more curious why you think Russia is justified in their actions. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 1 child comment replies: [+] Cowbee@lemmy.ml 4 points 1 year ago* (1 child) [removed by mod] permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 1 child comment replies: [–] Alexstarfire@lemmy.world -2 points 1 year ago Uncritically? I think you need to read between the lines of what aggressors say. And this is true about the US too. At best they give you half truths and excuses. I suppose you believe Iraq had WMDs too? After all, that's what the US said. You can't tell me Russia doesn't want parts of Ukraine, then in the same post say that a chunk of Ukraine wants to be invaded (i.e. join Russia), when Russia has also stated that as one of the reasons for invading. Even if they want to join Russia, that doesn't give Russia the right to invade to "liberate" them. I'm not a historical expert on any of this. I just know what is reported in the media, which is not going to be the entire history. They aren't a history class. permalink fedilink source parent load more comments (-1 replies) load more comments (-1 replies)
[–] Alexstarfire@lemmy.world -3 points 1 year ago (2 children) Perhaps Russia could have not attacked? Nah, too complicated. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [+] Cowbee@lemmy.ml 6 points 1 year ago (2 children) [removed by mod] permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] Alexstarfire@lemmy.world -3 points 1 year ago (1 child) I feel like I've been pretty clear on this. Russia is the aggressor and wants Ukraine's stuff. Russia just needed to not attack. This is obvious because every deal Russia's talked about includes taking/keeping Ukrainian land they occupy. I'm more curious why you think Russia is justified in their actions. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 1 child comment replies: [+] Cowbee@lemmy.ml 4 points 1 year ago* (1 child) [removed by mod] permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 1 child comment replies: [–] Alexstarfire@lemmy.world -2 points 1 year ago Uncritically? I think you need to read between the lines of what aggressors say. And this is true about the US too. At best they give you half truths and excuses. I suppose you believe Iraq had WMDs too? After all, that's what the US said. You can't tell me Russia doesn't want parts of Ukraine, then in the same post say that a chunk of Ukraine wants to be invaded (i.e. join Russia), when Russia has also stated that as one of the reasons for invading. Even if they want to join Russia, that doesn't give Russia the right to invade to "liberate" them. I'm not a historical expert on any of this. I just know what is reported in the media, which is not going to be the entire history. They aren't a history class. permalink fedilink source parent load more comments (-1 replies) load more comments (-1 replies)
[+] Cowbee@lemmy.ml 6 points 1 year ago (2 children) [removed by mod] permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] Alexstarfire@lemmy.world -3 points 1 year ago (1 child) I feel like I've been pretty clear on this. Russia is the aggressor and wants Ukraine's stuff. Russia just needed to not attack. This is obvious because every deal Russia's talked about includes taking/keeping Ukrainian land they occupy. I'm more curious why you think Russia is justified in their actions. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 1 child comment replies: [+] Cowbee@lemmy.ml 4 points 1 year ago* (1 child) [removed by mod] permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 1 child comment replies: [–] Alexstarfire@lemmy.world -2 points 1 year ago Uncritically? I think you need to read between the lines of what aggressors say. And this is true about the US too. At best they give you half truths and excuses. I suppose you believe Iraq had WMDs too? After all, that's what the US said. You can't tell me Russia doesn't want parts of Ukraine, then in the same post say that a chunk of Ukraine wants to be invaded (i.e. join Russia), when Russia has also stated that as one of the reasons for invading. Even if they want to join Russia, that doesn't give Russia the right to invade to "liberate" them. I'm not a historical expert on any of this. I just know what is reported in the media, which is not going to be the entire history. They aren't a history class. permalink fedilink source parent load more comments (-1 replies)
[–] Alexstarfire@lemmy.world -3 points 1 year ago (1 child) I feel like I've been pretty clear on this. Russia is the aggressor and wants Ukraine's stuff. Russia just needed to not attack. This is obvious because every deal Russia's talked about includes taking/keeping Ukrainian land they occupy. I'm more curious why you think Russia is justified in their actions. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 1 child comment replies: [+] Cowbee@lemmy.ml 4 points 1 year ago* (1 child) [removed by mod] permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 1 child comment replies: [–] Alexstarfire@lemmy.world -2 points 1 year ago Uncritically? I think you need to read between the lines of what aggressors say. And this is true about the US too. At best they give you half truths and excuses. I suppose you believe Iraq had WMDs too? After all, that's what the US said. You can't tell me Russia doesn't want parts of Ukraine, then in the same post say that a chunk of Ukraine wants to be invaded (i.e. join Russia), when Russia has also stated that as one of the reasons for invading. Even if they want to join Russia, that doesn't give Russia the right to invade to "liberate" them. I'm not a historical expert on any of this. I just know what is reported in the media, which is not going to be the entire history. They aren't a history class. permalink fedilink source parent load more comments (-1 replies)
[+] Cowbee@lemmy.ml 4 points 1 year ago* (1 child) [removed by mod] permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 1 child comment replies: [–] Alexstarfire@lemmy.world -2 points 1 year ago Uncritically? I think you need to read between the lines of what aggressors say. And this is true about the US too. At best they give you half truths and excuses. I suppose you believe Iraq had WMDs too? After all, that's what the US said. You can't tell me Russia doesn't want parts of Ukraine, then in the same post say that a chunk of Ukraine wants to be invaded (i.e. join Russia), when Russia has also stated that as one of the reasons for invading. Even if they want to join Russia, that doesn't give Russia the right to invade to "liberate" them. I'm not a historical expert on any of this. I just know what is reported in the media, which is not going to be the entire history. They aren't a history class. permalink fedilink source parent
[–] Alexstarfire@lemmy.world -2 points 1 year ago Uncritically? I think you need to read between the lines of what aggressors say. And this is true about the US too. At best they give you half truths and excuses. I suppose you believe Iraq had WMDs too? After all, that's what the US said. You can't tell me Russia doesn't want parts of Ukraine, then in the same post say that a chunk of Ukraine wants to be invaded (i.e. join Russia), when Russia has also stated that as one of the reasons for invading. Even if they want to join Russia, that doesn't give Russia the right to invade to "liberate" them. I'm not a historical expert on any of this. I just know what is reported in the media, which is not going to be the entire history. They aren't a history class. permalink fedilink source parent
[–] Semi_Hemi_Demigod@lemmy.world -5 points 1 year ago Yeah we only like Eastern imperialism! permalink fedilink source parent
[–] Semi_Hemi_Demigod@lemmy.world -1 points 1 year ago Because OP loves Putin. permalink fedilink source parent
[–] mannycalavera@feddit.uk -3 points 1 year ago Because OP is a 14 year old troll 🧌. permalink fedilink source parent