you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[+] 17 points 1 year ago (16 children)
  • [–] 1 point 1 year ago (6 children)

    How they're "put down" (that's a very kind euphemism) is only part of the problem. It's how they're forced to live

    That's their entire life.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 6 child comments
  • [+] 26 points 1 year ago (4 children)
  • [–] 13 points 1 year ago (3 children)

    This is the internet. Deflection from the point being made, in an effort to one-up or simply argue with a post.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 3 child comments
  • [–] 2 points 1 year ago (2 children)

    More specifically this is Lemmy. If we don't have morons arguing with the dumbest logic possible, something is wrong.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [+] -4 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (7 children)
  • [+] 16 points 1 year ago (6 children)
  • [+] -13 points 1 year ago (5 children)
  • [+] 12 points 1 year ago (2 children)
  • [+] -7 points 1 year ago (1 child)
  • [–] 18 points 1 year ago

    You used an individual animal's tragic death to stand on a soapbox and denounce the animal agriculture industry. It's a bit like being told a child died and saying, "Are you aware of what happens to children in Gaza??"

    You don't need to make everything about your personal (plant-based imitation) beef with humans eating meat.

  • source
  • parent
  • [–] 0 points 1 year ago

    Between what the law says and what actually happens, there is a yawning gulf. It's the same in basically all jurisdictions where there are animal-welfare laws. The meat industry is powerful and consumers are unrelenting in their clamor for cheap meat. With such incentives, the weakest link is always going to be animals, which by definition have no voice.

  • source
  • parent