235
Italy OKs $15.5 billion project to build world's longest suspension bridge from mainland to Sicily (apnews.com)
submitted 1 year ago by to c/world@lemmy.world
21 comments fedilink hide all child comments
 

MILAN (AP) — Italy cleared the way Wednesday to build the world’s largest suspension bridge linking the Italian mainland with Sicily in a massive 13.5 billion euro ($15.5 billion) infrastructure project that has been long delayed by debates over its scale, earthquake threats, environmental impact and the specter of mafia interference.

The Strait of Messina Bridge will be “the biggest infrastructure project in the West,” Transport Minister Matteo Salvini told a news conference in Rome, after an interministerial committee with oversight of strategic public investments approved the project.

Premier Giorgia Meloni said that the bridge “will be an engineering symbol of global significance.’'

Salvini cited studies showing the project will create 120,000 jobs a year and accelerate growth in economically lagging southern Italy, as billions more in investments are made in roads and other infrastructure projects accompanying the bridge.

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] 23 points 1 year ago (3 children)

Bridge could count toward NATO spending target

The project could provide a boost to Italy’s commitment to raise defense spending to 5% of GDP targeted by NATO, as the government has indicated it would classify the bridge as defense-related, helping it to meet a 1.5% security component. Italy argues that the bridge would form a strategic corridor for rapid troop movements and equipment deployment to NATO’s southern flanks, qualifying it as a “security-enhancing infrastructure.”

A group of more than 600 professors and researchers signed a letter earlier this summer opposing the military classification, noting that such a move would require additional assessments to see if it could withstand military use.

  • permalink
  • fedilink
  • source
  • hideshow 3 child comments
    •
  • [–] 3 points 1 year ago

    This was the reason for the "increased spending" targets, to include basic infrastructure.

    As for withstand military use, it can either take the weight or it can't. However there is a can it take a missile factor. But honestly that would be there anyway.

  • permalink
  • fedilink
  • source
  • parent
  • [–] 2 points 1 year ago

    Honestly if it works economically, I think this kind of infrastructure project should at least partially count towards NATO targets. Not all of war is moving troops, some of it is logistics, keeping your citizenry relatively happy, and an accumulated history of economic investment. If they can manage to get a lot of that money into workers' hands, that alone is a huge benefit when combined with the transferrable skills you're reinforcing in your workforce.

    Not that we should have to justify infrastructure as military expenses. But I do think it kinda works.

  • permalink
  • fedilink
  • source
  • parent