Greentext

greentext@sh.itjust.works

8,964 readers

3,808 active

380 users here now

This is a place to share greentexts and witness the confounding life of Anon. If you're new to the Greentext community, think of it as a sort of zoo with Anon as the main attraction.

Be warned:

Anon is often crazy.
Anon is often depressed.
Anon frequently shares thoughts that are immature, offensive, or incomprehensible.

If you find yourself getting angry (or god forbid, agreeing) with something Anon has said, you might be doing it wrong.

founded 3 years ago

moderation log

moderators

Early_To_Risa@sh.itjust.works

Anon predicts the future (sh.itjust.works)

submitted 1 year ago by Early_To_Risa@sh.itjust.works to c/greentext@sh.itjust.works

116 comments fedilink hide all child comments

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments

[–] Rossphorus@lemmy.world 3 points 1 year ago (2 children)

You, the end user, don't have access to your camera's private key. Only the camera IC does. When your phone / SD card first receives the image/video it's already been signed by the hardware.

permalink

fedilink

source

parent

hideshow 2 child comments

[–] jumping_redditor@sh.itjust.works 1 point 1 year ago (1 child)

so you want the hardware to be significantly more opaque and almost impossible for new manufacturers to compete?

permalink

fedilink

source

parent

hideshow 1 child comment

[–] Rossphorus@lemmy.world 0 points 1 year ago

It's pretty standard practise these days to have some form of secure enclave on an SoC - Arm's TrustZone, Intel's SGX, AMD's SME/SEV. This wouldn't be any different. Many camera ICs are already using an Arm CPU internally already.

permalink

fedilink

source

parent