you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] 129 points 1 year ago (10 children)

2 removals and an edit, all 3 pertaining to things Trump's trying to bully his way into existence. Complete accident though.

Oh, they're still missing hours later? That's weird...

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 10 child comments
  • [–] 37 points 1 year ago (4 children)

    "We swear that our top developer, Chat GPT fixed the issue."

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 4 child comments
  • [–] 25 points 1 year ago (3 children)
  • [–] 13 points 1 year ago (2 children)

    Was it praising Hitler or drawing nude pictures of Taylor Swift?

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] -1 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (4 children)

    Devil's advocate, but depending on how the page is laid out in the code, it could be that the entirety of Article 1 is a section, so if a mistake was made at some point in the section it would affect the rest of it.

    Considering they fired all of the competent people, it's within the realm of possibility that it was a fuck up. Shit, they might have just copy and pasted whatever chatgpt spit out.

    But if it was really a coding error, all they'd have to do is provide the merge request.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 4 child comments
  • [–] -3 points 1 year ago (3 children)

    Fuck you and your devil’s advocate the results are what matter and the results are what we’re planned, get your head out of your fucking ass

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 3 child comments
  • [–] 0 points 1 year ago (2 children)

    Nah I'm blaming AI for this one too.

    But why is AI fucking with the constitution at all? Dunno

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] 8 points 1 year ago* (1 child)

    But why is AI fucking with the constitution at all? Dunno

    This. All of these hypotheticals and excuses people are making are missing/ignoring 1 simple detail:

    Why were they editing The Constitution to begin with?

    It only changes through acts of Congress and requires a super-majority. So why were they editing it?

    @onslaught545 - Seriously? You're going the "code layout" route? Even a syntax error wouldn't leave the rest of Section 8 unaffected while removing the hundreds of pages after it. Seriously, look at the site's structure, each section has hundreds of pages. This isn't a fluke.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 1 child comment