you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[+] 26 points 1 year ago (14 children)
  • [+] -6 points 1 year ago (9 children)
  • [+] 5 points 1 year ago (8 children)
  • [+] -2 points 1 year ago (8 children)
  • [+] 6 points 1 year ago (7 children)
  • [+] 0 points 1 year ago (6 children)
  • [+] 4 points 1 year ago (5 children)
  • [–] -2 points 1 year ago

    What war? NATO isn’t at war. But if you’re in Europe, sooner or later, you’re going to be fighting Russia. They’re not going to stop at Donbass.

    Said who, some experts based on a blackrock report written by McKinsley and edited by lockheed?

  • source
  • parent
  • [–] -4 points 1 year ago

    I don't really care. "Eastern propaganda" you're the one sucking lockheed martin dick, asshole. It would be funny if scums like you weren't organising the salvaging of our social systems in order to buy bombs to defend ourself against big bad russia.

    Russia, who, again, wouldn't even be its own country if it wasn't for the nato. Putin, trump, the european leaders, they're all on the same side. The genocide. Yours.

  • source
  • parent
  • load more comments (-1 replies)
  • [+] -8 points 1 year ago (4 children)

    No, they are an alliance for defense. Nothing peaceful about it, they will fuck you up with military force if you mess with any one of the US's economic interests.

    There, FTFY

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 4 child comments
  • [+] 8 points 1 year ago (3 children)
  • [+] -8 points 1 year ago (2 children)

    The point is that "NATO" is an umbrella term for "US's interests" or "US military".
    The US can and absolutely does wreck shit up for the sake of their own interests, regardless of international law. "NATO" only comes into play when either other countries are willing to step in or the US might need a veneer of legitimacy.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [+] 7 points 1 year ago (1 child)
  • load more comments (-1 replies)