Bluesky had some controversy when it first came out. Now that it's been around for a while, I'm curious what the consensus is. How does it compare to Mastodon? Is Bluesky now self-hostable and compatible with the Fediverse?

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments

[–] Kirk@startrek.website 2 points 1 year ago (2 children)

But if it's open source what is stopping them from simply creating another bluesky like yesterday?

permalink

fedilink

source

parent

hideshow 2 child comments

[–] HailSeitan@lemmy.world 3 points 1 year ago (1 child)

From what I can tell, Bluesky is much more demanding in terms of the technical challenge of doing this on your own, and part of the issue is that some of the key tools to make this easier don’t really exist yet, making it much harder than setting up a Mastodon instance for example, so part of what they want to do is bridge that gap as well as stand up more independent servers.

permalink

fedilink

source

parent

hideshow 1 child comment

[–] Kirk@startrek.website 2 points 1 year ago

So to make a bluesky with (for example) two users is available for anyone to create at any time, but is so extremely technically intensive that absolutely nobody besides the one company is capable of doing it? You don't find that the slightest bit odd? I think the open source and decentralized claimes are straight up lies.

permalink

fedilink

source

parent