I know they probably thought this would be super cool and all, but I'm just utterly disgusted by it.

There are full-on transit vehicles that have a smaller footprint and can carry more than double the number of people.

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] 5 points 1 year ago (3 children)

I recently thought about "muscle cars" in comparison to normal sports cars. Muscle cars are just heavy and slower cars with bigger motors, arent they?

In the past I found them cool, but arent they pretty dumb?

  • source
  • hideshow 3 child comments
  • [–] [S] 12 points 1 year ago

    As a car enthusiast I'm incredibly conflicted because muscle cars are cool -- but I can't for the life of me tell you why. They're loud, heavy, inefficient, and much clumsier and slower than other sports cars (which is why I prefer sports cars anyway). They have incredible amounts of power but they can't even use it properly except on a prepped drag surface, maybe.

    You're right, they really are dumb as fuck.

  • source
  • parent
  • [–] 6 points 1 year ago (1 child)

    Muscle cars are slower going around a twisty race track than a standard sports cars, but are supposed to be good at going fast in a straight line, think of those desert interstate pictures where the highway stretches straight to the horizon. I don’t think there are many legal outlets for taking advantage of what muscle cars are supposed to do.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 1 child comment
  • load more comments (-1 replies)